I correct a typo, please read again

[Sky89]

Hello,


I correct a typo, please read again:

I have thought more about the following paper about Lock Cohorting: A
General Technique for Designing NUMA Locks:

http://groups.csail.mit.edu/mag/a13-dice.pdf


I think it is not a "bright" idea, this NUMA Locks that uses Lock
Cohorting do not optimize the inside of the critical sections protected
by the NUMA Locks that use Lock Cohorting, because the inside of those
critical sections may transfer/bring Data from different NUMA nodes, so
this will cancel the gains that we have got from NUMA Locks that uses
Lock cohorting. So i don't think i will implement Lock Cohorting.

So then i have invented my scalable AMLock and scalable MLock, please
read for example about my scalable MLock here:

https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/scalable-mlock

You can download my scalable MLock for C++ by downloading
my C++ synchronization objects library that contains some of my
"inventions" here:

https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/c-synchronization-objects-library


The Delphi and FreePascal version of my scalable MLock is here:

https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/scalable-mlock




Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

[Juha Nieminen]

Sky89 <Sk...@sky68.com> wrote:
> I correct a typo, please read again:

Could you please stop spamming?

If the topic is C++, then it's fine, but just stop spamming the same
thing over and over.