Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Remember the Vasa!
69 views
Skip to first unread message
Jouko Koski
May 29, 2018, 6:47:18 AM5/29/18
to
Bjarne Stroustrup himself is expressing some concerns about the C++
language development:
http://open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2018/p0977r0.pdf
I'm afraid that some of these concerns should have applied already
in earlier rounds of the standardization, but it is good that they
are stated at least now.
--
Jouko
language development:
http://open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2018/p0977r0.pdf
I'm afraid that some of these concerns should have applied already
in earlier rounds of the standardization, but it is good that they
are stated at least now.
--
Jouko
Alf P. Steinbach
May 29, 2018, 10:24:20 AM5/29/18
to
> Together [the proposals] are insanity to the point of endangering the
> future of C++
… but he's right on the mark.
Cheers!,
- Alf
Scott Lurndal
May 29, 2018, 11:45:14 AM5/29/18
to
woodb...@gmail.com
May 29, 2018, 1:48:59 PM5/29/18
to
I hope it won't be a dud, but ...
Brian
Ebenzer Enterprises
http://webEbenezer.net
Jorgen Grahn
May 30, 2018, 7:19:31 AM5/30/18
to
On Tue, 2018-05-29, Jouko Koski wrote:
> Bjarne Stroustrup himself is expressing some concerns about the C++
> language development:
>
> http://open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2018/p0977r0.pdf
Good. People (hopefully) listen to Stroustrup, and I'm happy to see
> Bjarne Stroustrup himself is expressing some concerns about the C++
> language development:
>
> http://open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2018/p0977r0.pdf
that he hasn't join the ADD school of language design. (I wasn't
aware the committee had gotten that feature-happy though; that's a
bit worrying.)
/Jorgen
--
// Jorgen Grahn <grahn@ Oo o. . .
\X/ snipabacken.se> O o .
Thiago Adams
May 30, 2018, 9:42:14 AM5/30/18
to
C++ is becoming too complex, and now they will be
more comfortable to repeat that.
"Modern C++" become a bad adjective in my option.
Jorgen Grahn
May 30, 2018, 10:53:32 AM5/30/18
to
On Wed, 2018-05-30, Thiago Adams wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 29, 2018 at 7:47:18 AM UTC-3, Jouko Koski wrote:
>> Bjarne Stroustrup himself is expressing some concerns about the C++
>> language development:
>>
>> http://open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2018/p0977r0.pdf
>>
>> I'm afraid that some of these concerns should have applied already
>> in earlier rounds of the standardization, but it is good that they
>> are stated at least now.
>
> On Tuesday, May 29, 2018 at 7:47:18 AM UTC-3, Jouko Koski wrote:
>> Bjarne Stroustrup himself is expressing some concerns about the C++
>> language development:
>>
>> http://open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2018/p0977r0.pdf
>>
>> I'm afraid that some of these concerns should have applied already
>> in earlier rounds of the standardization, but it is good that they
>> are stated at least now.
>
> Some C++ programmers were waiting someone else to say that
> C++ is becoming too complex, and now they will be
> more comfortable to repeat that.
In my case, I respect Stroustrup for his good taste in language
> C++ is becoming too complex, and now they will be
> more comfortable to repeat that.
design, and haven't followed the ISO work in detail ...
Doesn't mean I will join the small Usenet choir of whiners anytime
soon.
> "Modern C++" become a bad adjective in my option.
Message has been deleted
0 new messages