Does anynone see what's so speial about this loop ?

[Bonita Montero]

for( BOOL (WINAPI *getProcess)( HANDLE, LPPROCESSENTRY32W ) =
Process32FirstW; ; )
{
PROCESSENTRY32W pew;
pew.dwSize = sizeof(PROCESSENTRY32W);
if( !getProcess( xhSnapshot.get(), &pew ) )
break;
processes.emplace_back( pew, true, process_it(), process_it() );
getProcess = Process32NextW;
}

[Andrey Tarasevich]

Someone failed to take advantage of the opportunity to put `getProcess =
Process32NextW` into the loop header

for( BOOL (WINAPI *getProcess)( HANDLE, LPPROCESSENTRY32W ) =

Process32FirstW; ; getProcess = Process32NextW)

?

[Bonita Montero]

I wouldn't do that because of my taste that the for()-line
shouldn't be so long.

[Andrey Tarasevich]

I would, because of my taste that whenever possible, loops should
support plain `continue`, i.e. immediate `continue` should not break
iteration logic.

--
Best regards,
Andrey

[Bonita Montero]

Am 24.11.2022 um 19:24 schrieb Andrey Tarasevich:

> I would, because of my taste that whenever possible, loops should
> support plain `continue`, i.e. immediate `continue` should not break
> iteration logic.

You're compulsive.