"SleepPat.HTM" is _much cleaner now.

[Jeff-Relf.Me]

Why would I manually run _your "blah" and "offon"
when _my "X.EXE" does it all, automatically ? to wit:

24.4 hour Day, 81% offline:

8.5 Jan 27 { 10:33 P, 2017 }:32 Vмпν
.9 Jan 27 { 2: 3 P, 2017 }:51 Vмυϗ

2.0 Jan 27 { 1:11 P, 2017 }:13 Vмμч
.2 Jan 27 { 11:14 A, 2017 }: 4 VмΡɼ

1.9 Jan 27 { 11: A, 2017 }:34 VмΟY
.3 Jan 27 { 9: 4 A, 2017 }:19 VмʪБ

3.7 Jan 27 { 8:43 A, 2017 }:31 Vмʧɛ
2.6 Jan 27 { 5: A, 2017 }:31 VмʂV

3.6 Jan 27 { 2:22 A, 2017 }:58 Vмɧи
.6 Jan 26 { 10:45 P, 2017 }:15 VмȹΥ

"SleepPat.HTM" is _much cleaner now,
as it _only shows "When I slept" and "%OffLine"; to wit:

http://Jeff-Relf.Me/SleepPat.PNG
http://Jeff-Relf.Me/SleepPat.HTM

[deplorable owl]

In comp.os.linux.advocacy Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote:
> Why would I manually run _your "blah" and "offon"
> when _my "X.EXE" does it all, automatically ? to wit:
>

It's not about what program you run to process the data. It's about
keeping the data in a flexible and compact form. The form you use for
input data requires at least five times as much space as would simply
keeping a record of timestamps, and also requires that any other program
that might want to make use of your data has to go through unnecessary
contortions.

> 24.4 hour Day, 81% offline:
>
> 8.5 Jan 27 { 10:33 P, 2017 }:32 Vмпν
> .9 Jan 27 { 2: 3 P, 2017 }:51 Vмυϗ
>
> 2.0 Jan 27 { 1:11 P, 2017 }:13 Vмμч
> .2 Jan 27 { 11:14 A, 2017 }: 4 VмΡɼ
>
> 1.9 Jan 27 { 11: A, 2017 }:34 VмΟY
> .3 Jan 27 { 9: 4 A, 2017 }:19 VмʪБ
>
> 3.7 Jan 27 { 8:43 A, 2017 }:31 Vмʧɛ
> 2.6 Jan 27 { 5: A, 2017 }:31 VмʂV
>
> 3.6 Jan 27 { 2:22 A, 2017 }:58 Vмɧи
> .6 Jan 26 { 10:45 P, 2017 }:15 VмȹΥ
>
> "SleepPat.HTM" is _much cleaner now,
> as it _only shows "When I slept" and "%OffLine"; to wit:
>
> http://Jeff-Relf.Me/SleepPat.PNG
> http://Jeff-Relf.Me/SleepPat.HTM

It's cleaner, but you lose information for days when you
might have slept fewer than 7 hours.

[Snit]

On 1/29/17, 12:38 PM, in article hgvnbm...@rooftop.invalid, "deplorable

owl" <o...@rooftop.invalid> wrote:

> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote:
>> Why would I manually run _your "blah" and "offon"
>> when _my "X.EXE" does it all, automatically ? to wit:
>>
>
> It's not about what program you run to process the data. It's about
> keeping the data in a flexible and compact form. The form you use for
> input data requires at least five times as much space as would simply
> keeping a record of timestamps, and also requires that any other program
> that might want to make use of your data has to go through unnecessary
> contortions.

But you can script it and take more steps... which is what I noted was bad
and then you twisted to say I do not think scripting things to avoid work
makes sense.

Now you are in the position I was... no reason for him to not do things in a
more direct and logical way, eh?

>> 24.4 hour Day, 81% offline:
>>
>> 8.5 Jan 27 { 10:33 P, 2017 }:32 Vмпν
>> .9 Jan 27 { 2: 3 P, 2017 }:51 Vмυϗ
>>
>> 2.0 Jan 27 { 1:11 P, 2017 }:13 Vмμч
>> .2 Jan 27 { 11:14 A, 2017 }: 4 VмΡɼ
>>
>> 1.9 Jan 27 { 11: A, 2017 }:34 VмΟY
>> .3 Jan 27 { 9: 4 A, 2017 }:19 VмʪБ
>>
>> 3.7 Jan 27 { 8:43 A, 2017 }:31 Vмʧɛ
>> 2.6 Jan 27 { 5: A, 2017 }:31 VмʂV
>>
>> 3.6 Jan 27 { 2:22 A, 2017 }:58 Vмɧи
>> .6 Jan 26 { 10:45 P, 2017 }:15 VмȹΥ
>>
>> "SleepPat.HTM" is _much cleaner now,
>> as it _only shows "When I slept" and "%OffLine"; to wit:
>>
>> http://Jeff-Relf.Me/SleepPat.PNG
>> http://Jeff-Relf.Me/SleepPat.HTM
>
>
> It's cleaner, but you lose information for days when you
> might have slept fewer than 7 hours.
>

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

[Jeff-Relf.Me]

You ( Owl ) replied:

> > Why would I manually run _your "blah" and "offon"
> > when _my "X.EXE" does it all, automatically ? to wit:
>
> It's not about what program you run to process the data. It's about
> keeping the data in a flexible and compact form. The form you use for
> input data requires at least five times as much space as would simply
> keeping a record of timestamps, and also requires that any other program
> that might want to make use of your data has to go through unnecessary
> contortions.

For me, and _only me, "SleepLog.TXT" is
the _ideal launching point for "SleepPat.HTM".
I doesn't have to work for anyone else; and it doesn't.

I'm running a fast/cool i7-5775c and a TeraByte SSD;
if space were a concern ( it's not ), I'd write:

Vмпν Vмυϗ Vмμч VмΡɼ VмΟY VмʪБ Vмʧɛ VмʂV Vмɧи VмȹΥ

> > http://Jeff-Relf.Me/SleepPat.PNG
> > http://Jeff-Relf.Me/SleepPat.HTM
>
> It's cleaner, but you lose information for days when you
> might have slept fewer than 7 hours.

6.5 hours is rounded up to 7.
Adding detail obscures the all important "trend":

When will I wake up, most likely ?