Hello..
We have to be careful with sequential consistency...
I have just updated my new algorithm of new scalable
distributed Reader-Writer mutex to version 1.31 and i have made it
sequential consistent.. and now i think that all is correct...
Also, like Seqlock or RCU , version2 of my new scalable distributed
reader-writer mutex doesn't use any atomic operations and/or StoreLoad
style memory barriers on the reader side, so it's very fast and
scalable..but you have to use the define's option TLW_RWLockX or the
define's option TRWLockX inside the defines1.inc file for that.
You can download my new updated Scalable Distributed Reader-Writer mutex
1.31 from:
https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/scalable-distributed-reader-writer-mutex
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.