This post showing much we want Rick C hodgin to leave this group

mche...@gmail.com

unread,

Jan 10, 2018, 10:51:55 AM1/10/18

to

This post showing much we want Rick C hodgin to leave this group. If you want him to leave. Leave you name in reply. thanks

James Moe

unread,

Jan 10, 2018, 1:56:17 PM1/10/18

to

On 01/10/2018 08:51 AM, mche...@gmail.com wrote:
> This post showing much we want Rick C hodgin to leave this group
>

Filter his posts to Trash (plonk!). Ignore response threads.

--
James Moe
jmm-list at sohnen-moe dot com
Think.

Mr Flibble

unread,

Jan 10, 2018, 2:03:08 PM1/10/18

to

On 10/01/2018 15:51, mche...@gmail.com wrote:
> This post showing much we want Rick C hodgin to leave this group. If you want him to leave. Leave you name in reply. thanks
>

I would rather Hodgin simply stop spamming his religious vomit and post
about C++ instead.

/Flibble

--
"Suppose it’s all true, and you walk up to the pearly gates, and are
confronted by God," Bryne asked on his show The Meaning of Life. "What
will Stephen Fry say to him, her, or it?"
"I’d say, bone cancer in children? What’s that about?" Fry replied.
"How dare you? How dare you create a world to which there is such misery
that is not our fault. It’s not right, it’s utterly, utterly evil."
"Why should I respect a capricious, mean-minded, stupid God who creates
a world that is so full of injustice and pain. That’s what I would say."

Daniel

unread,

Jan 10, 2018, 2:39:52 PM1/10/18

to

On Wednesday, January 10, 2018 at 2:03:08 PM UTC-5, Mr Flibble wrote:
> On 10/01/2018 15:51, mche...@gmail.com wrote:
> > This post showing much we want Rick C hodgin to leave this group. If you want him to leave. Leave you name in reply. thanks
> >
>
> I would rather Hodgin simply stop spamming his religious vomit and post
> about C++ instead.
>

Me too, but I don't think he can stop, even if he wanted to. It's as if he's been exposed to a severe demonic molestation which manifests itself as obsessive spanning of usenet.

David Brown

unread,

Jan 10, 2018, 4:03:28 PM1/10/18

to

On 10/01/18 16:51, mche...@gmail.com wrote:
> This post showing much we want Rick C hodgin to leave this group. If you want him to leave. Leave you name in reply. thanks
>

Personally, I would rather /you/ left it. Rick's religious posts are
annoying, but the many fakes, impersonations, and totally tasteless and
inhumane comments about his mother are worse IMHO. And Rick does make
some on-topic posts - you contribute nothing but your hatred. I really
don't care what Rick may or may not have done to provoke you - please
take your unpleasantness elsewhere.

Chris M. Thomasson

unread,

Jan 10, 2018, 4:14:03 PM1/10/18

to

On 1/10/2018 11:02 AM, Mr Flibble wrote:
> On 10/01/2018 15:51, mche...@gmail.com wrote:
>> This post showing much we want Rick C hodgin to leave this group. If
>> you want him to leave. Leave you name in reply. thanks
>>
>
> I would rather Hodgin simply stop spamming his religious vomit and post
> about C++ instead.

This is basically impossible for me to disagree with. If anything, Rick,
assuming he cannot stop, should create a nice single thread, that he
posts to, and grows over time. A single thread... Damn it!

:^)

Chris M. Thomasson

unread,

Jan 10, 2018, 4:17:59 PM1/10/18

to

He can create different subjects within the single thread by labeling
each post, while the subject shall remain constant! Heck, he can create
a C++ parser that reads all of the subjects and creates multiple threads
out of one subject. That might be a fairly "interesting" C++ project for
him to work on.

Also, Rick should create a simple CAlive online compiler, gosh darn it!

cda...@gmail.com

unread,

Jan 10, 2018, 7:49:08 PM1/10/18

to

I don't know if this is true for all compilers, but the ones that I've helped work on were hard to code. Really hard. Seriously. I remember our one project manager saying he had to back down on what he expected because he felt that some of us were overwhelmed. In particular, the part it question the portion of the optimizer that traversed the abstract syntax tree.

Manfred

unread,

Jan 11, 2018, 7:38:37 AM1/11/18

to

Agreed, David
+1

Richard

unread,

Jan 11, 2018, 1:30:35 PM1/11/18

to

[Please do not mail me a copy of your followup]

cda...@gmail.com spake the secret code
<c2cbcc1f-1f62-44f5...@googlegroups.com> thusly:

While I haven't attempted any contributions to the core compiler in
the clang source base, I have been impressed with their code
organization and general tidyness. That doesn't decrease the intrinsic
complexity in the problem domain, but having well organized source
code at least takes a whole bunch of things off the table that would
detract from understanding.
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" free book <http://tinyurl.com/d3d-pipeline>
The Terminals Wiki <http://terminals-wiki.org>
The Computer Graphics Museum <http://computergraphicsmuseum.org>
Legalize Adulthood! (my blog) <http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com>

Lynn McGuire

unread,

Jan 11, 2018, 4:48:14 PM1/11/18

to

+1

Lynn

Alexander Huszagh

unread,

Jan 11, 2018, 6:46:01 PM1/11/18

to

On Wednesday, January 10, 2018 at 7:51:55 AM UTC-8, mche...@gmail.com wrote:
> This post showing much we want Rick C hodgin to leave this group. If you want him to leave. Leave you name in reply. thanks

+1.

Kenny McCormack

unread,

Jul 31, 2018, 3:20:51 AM7/31/18

to

In article <5d9825cb-8cbc-4975...@googlegroups.com>,

I can no more imagine CLC/C++ without the amusement generated by Rick, than
I can imagine either group without the amusement of Kiki (*).

(*) Yes, as far as I know, Kiki only posts in CLC (not C++), but the point
is still valid. FWIW, there doesn't seem to be any standard appointed
topicality cop in CLC++ like there is in CLC. Which is a shame...

--
Pensacola - the thinking man's drink.