And since it's a Java book, you're asking this in a C++ group why?
It is not. The full name is:
Data Abstraction and Problem Solving with C++: Walls and Mirrors (4th
Edition) (Hardcover)
ps Yes, I was crazy enough to click the link... ;)
???
According to the Amazon link he posted, its title is
"Data Abstraction and Problem Solving with C++: Walls and Mirrors (4th
Edition) (Hardcover)"
which looks like C++ to me.
I've never encountered it, but the customer reviews are extremely mixed.
--
Richard Herring
Data structure is about algorithms, ways to improve performance and
storage
One book will end its life just after a few years known,
Some writer names will last for years later on
Some will be quickly forgotten
Some people ask me whether I am angry after a loss of precious/
priceless things or tease over my own pain. I have got to tell that
they are complete iddeeeaaats to make such an obvious question. Of
course I am a human being, I have senses. Only thick skin animals
would say No or show laughing signs.
But such loss makes us all remember together forever.
I wish to find me again soon.
They used this in my course as well. I bought it but never
once opened it. (Nor did I even learn C++; my school was
kind enough to let me write psuedocode on tests. I never
once needed anything sembling OO for the course.)
So I would say wait before you buy it. If you want to
learn data structures try flipping through Knuth or
reading /C Unleashed/ or trying comp.programming.
Oh. I went to Amazon and looked for that title, and only found the
Java version.
[EMILY-LATELLA]
Oh, that's very different. Never mind!
[/EMILY-LATELLA]
You can always see where they link before following:
http://preview.tinyurl.com/yzm7kja
^^^^^^^^ just add this
Phil
I've never really read Knuth, but IMHO that's an unusual advice to
people who haven't touched algorithms and data structures before.
Like Barbie would say: "Knuth is hard".
/Jorgen
--
// Jorgen Grahn <grahn@ Oo o. . .
\X/ snipabacken.se> O o .
The first page or so of each data-structure-related section
gives a theoretical overview of the structure, and I've always
liked his diagrams.
It is true that understanding his MIX code and doing his
exercises are very difficult, though. :)
Andrew