Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

February meetings

56 views
Skip to first unread message

woodb...@gmail.com

unread,
Feb 1, 2016, 5:44:18 PM2/1/16
to
I've taken info from this page

http://meetingcpp.com/index.php/newsreader/items/c-user-group-meetings-in-february-2016.html

and come up with this:

The Meetings

1st Dublin - C/C++ Meetup
3rd Saint Louis - Resharper C++, Scott Meyers book, group exercise
10th Utah - Getting Started with C++
10th Washington, DC - Q & A / Info Sharing
10th San Francisco - Reliability and security of today's software platforms
11th Dresden - TBA
15th Austin - Monthly C/C++ Pub Social
15th Zentralschweiz - C++11/14 Idioms
16th Berlin - TBA
16th Hamburg - Monthly meeting
17th Sacramento - Talk C++
17th Düsseldorf - Building blocks of Metaprogramming
17th Seattle - C++2D Graphics Standardization
18th Berlin (Qt) - Have food/drinks and talk about Qt
21st Ho Chi Minh - HCM C++ User Group Meeting
23rd Macedonia - Emscripten - run your C/C++ code in web browser
24th San Francisco - Workshop and Discussion Group
24th Washington, DC - Q & A / Info Sharing
24th Stuttgart / Ludwigsburg (Qt) - Qt Meetup
25th Bremen - Lisp und ECL
27th Sofia - First Meeting
------------------------------------------------

If others are interested in a C++ meeting in the St. Paul,
Minnesota area, please let me know. By the grace of G-d,
I'm able to provide a meeting area in a conference room in
the office building where Ebenezer Enterprises is, and I
would be happy to give a talk or two.

Last month

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.lang.c++/o8whK7pA_sw

someone said that not all of these "meetings" may be
taking place. It sounded to me like the ones that have
a specific meeting topic are real meetings and the ones
that have a generic topic may be false positives.


Brian
Ebenezer Enterprises - In G-d we trust.
http://webEbenezer.net

Jerry Stuckle

unread,
Feb 1, 2016, 7:59:01 PM2/1/16
to
Lots of BS. For instance, the Washington, DC group hasn't met in over
two years, AFAIK.

If someone is going to publicize user groups, they should at least make
*some* effort to see that the group meets (or even exists).

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
jstu...@attglobal.net
==================

Richard

unread,
Feb 4, 2016, 12:32:33 PM2/4/16
to
[Please do not mail me a copy of your followup]

Jerry Stuckle <jstu...@attglobal.net> spake the secret code
<n8our1$dm7$4...@jstuckle.eternal-september.org> thusly:
You pick one example and generalize to the whole list.

I can do that too.

The Utah group has met every month for it's entire existence.

Therefore, the list is flawless.
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" free book <http://tinyurl.com/d3d-pipeline>
The Computer Graphics Museum <http://computergraphicsmuseum.org>
The Terminals Wiki <http://terminals.classiccmp.org>
Legalize Adulthood! (my blog) <http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com>

Jerry Stuckle

unread,
Feb 4, 2016, 1:58:12 PM2/4/16
to
Nope, just one of several examples of user groups which no longer exist
- and haven't, for quite a while.

woodb...@gmail.com

unread,
Feb 4, 2016, 3:24:33 PM2/4/16
to
On Thursday, February 4, 2016 at 12:58:12 PM UTC-6, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> On 2/4/2016 12:32 PM, Richard wrote:
> > [Please do not mail me a copy of your followup]
> >
> > Jerry Stuckle <jstu...@attglobal.net> spake the secret code
> > <n8our1$dm7$4...@jstuckle.eternal-september.org> thusly:
> >
> >>
> >> Lots of BS. For instance, the Washington, DC group hasn't met in over
> >> two years, AFAIK.
> >
> > You pick one example and generalize to the whole list.
> >
> > I can do that too.
> >
> > The Utah group has met every month for it's entire existence.
> >
> > Therefore, the list is flawless.
> >
>
> Nope, just one of several examples of user groups which no longer exist
> - and haven't, for quite a while.
>

I could put some of the "meetings" in a different
section and mention that they may no longer be
meeting. Besides Washington, DC what others do you
think are no longer meeting?

I hope to help start a C++ group in the St. Paul,
Minnesota area. My plan is to meet quarterly rather
than monthly. I think it's pretty tough to come up
with good content on a monthly basis. It would be
great if some of the groups that have stopped meeting
would restart on a less ambitious basis.

Brian
Ebenezer Enterprises
http://webEbenezer.net

Jerry Stuckle

unread,
Feb 4, 2016, 3:35:23 PM2/4/16
to
On 2/4/2016 3:24 PM, woodb...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, February 4, 2016 at 12:58:12 PM UTC-6, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>> On 2/4/2016 12:32 PM, Richard wrote:
>>> [Please do not mail me a copy of your followup]
>>>
>>> Jerry Stuckle <jstu...@attglobal.net> spake the secret code
>>> <n8our1$dm7$4...@jstuckle.eternal-september.org> thusly:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Lots of BS. For instance, the Washington, DC group hasn't met in over
>>>> two years, AFAIK.
>>>
>>> You pick one example and generalize to the whole list.
>>>
>>> I can do that too.
>>>
>>> The Utah group has met every month for it's entire existence.
>>>
>>> Therefore, the list is flawless.
>>>
>>
>> Nope, just one of several examples of user groups which no longer exist
>> - and haven't, for quite a while.
>>
>
> I could put some of the "meetings" in a different
> section and mention that they may no longer be
> meeting. Besides Washington, DC what others do you
> think are no longer meeting?
>

Sacramento, for one. I'm sure if you're interested you can find others.

> I hope to help start a C++ group in the St. Paul,
> Minnesota area. My plan is to meet quarterly rather
> than monthly. I think it's pretty tough to come up
> with good content on a monthly basis. It would be
> great if some of the groups that have stopped meeting
> would restart on a less ambitious basis.
>
> Brian
> Ebenezer Enterprises
> http://webEbenezer.net
>

That's nice. But the only thing worse than no list is an incorrect list.

Geoff

unread,
Feb 4, 2016, 8:40:06 PM2/4/16
to
On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 12:24:11 -0800 (PST), woodb...@gmail.com wrote:

>I could put some of the "meetings" in a different
>section and mention that they may no longer be
>meeting. Besides Washington, DC what others do you
>think are no longer meeting?

You would be well advised to follow the links for those groups on that
web link you posted. The D.C. Meetups link is a dead link to the root
page of the Meetups site. If the group organizers can't be bothered to
keep their calendars updated I' say it's not worth listing anywhere.

Jerry Stuckle

unread,
Feb 5, 2016, 10:16:30 AM2/5/16
to
Geoff, it's not that they don't keep their calendars updated. They
stopped meeting at least two years ago. There's no calendar to update.
0 new messages