More of my philosophy about the problem of time and space..

[Amine Moulay Ramdane]

Hello,


More of my philosophy about the problem of time and space..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I think i am smart and i will explain more clearly so that you understand, so i invite you to read the following article
so that to understand the problem:

https://www.technologyreview.com/2019/12/07/65014/how-does-time-dilation-affect-aging-during-high-speed-space-travel/


So notice how it is saying the following:

"Time dilation goes back to Einstein’s theory of special relativity, which teaches us that motion through space actually creates alterations in the flow of time. The faster you move through the three dimensions that define physical space, the more slowly you’re moving through the fourth dimension, time––at least relative to another object. Time is measured differently for the twin who moved through space and the twin who stayed on Earth. The clock in motion will tick more slowly than the clocks we’re watching on Earth."


So i think that it is not saying it correctly, since when you say:

"The clock in motion will tick more slowly than the clocks we’re watching on Earth."

It is the problem since the theory must be logical in practice,
so we are not knowing how to explain it practically, so i think i will
explain it more:

I think that time has a characteristics that you can not understand easily practically and logically, since i can give you an example so that you understand:

So i think that there is something really important to notice,
since i think that for example the wide "space" of our universe or the
multiverse has always existed, so we can then say that there is no cause
that has created the wide "space" of our universe or multiverse, so then
we can then say that we can not give a meaning by the law of causation
in such case, since the law of "causation" doesn't apply to some things
such as the wide space of the universe, so then we can logically infer
that there is some things such as God or the wide space of the universe
that have no cause that has created them, so then we can logically infer
that we humans have the tendency to think things by using the law of
causation, but i think it is a big logical mistake, because there is
things such as the wide space of the universe that have no cause, so
time has the same problem i think, since you have the tendency to
want to explain time with the law of causation, but i think it is
a mistake.

Read my previous thoughts:

More of my philosophy about the multiple worlds and multiple universes and about time..

I think i am smart and i have just read the following article and i invite you to read it here:

What Is Time?

https://www.sciencealert.com/time


And notice that the article says the following about time:

--
"Two people moving at the same velocity will each agree their measures of distance and time match. As one person changes speed, however, they will see the other's measure of time and distance change, even as their own stays the same.

Without any reason to prioritize one perspective of time over another, this means time isn't a constant universal unit at all. It is a relative measurement that varies as objects move faster or slower, or as they're subjected to more or less gravity.

Gravity curves space and time: The stronger the gravity, the more it curves space-time, and the more time slows down."
--

So i think that what i am saying below about time is greatly probable,
since i think that there remains one important thing that i will say and it is that from my below thoughts of my philosophy about time, we can
say that there is like multiple worlds or universes that emerge when
Gravity curves space and time or the moving faster makes time becomes relative, so i think it is related to the subatomic layer, since when
Gravity curves space and time or the moving faster makes time relative, it is the subatomic layer that is changed and it composes again another
new world or universe that emerges that makes the time relative, and it is like the emergence of intelligence of an Ant colony, so read my previous thoughts so that to understand:

More of my philosophy about disorder and about God and more..

I think i am smart, and when you are naive you will quickly say that
God can not come from "disorder" like from where has come our universe,
but i will say that disorder is not a sufficient condition to make
God not exist, since in arabic we can say: "Hal min la' wujud ya'tina'
al wujud" , and its translation in english is: "Can from the not existent comes the existent ?", so as you are noticing that we can
for example say that the many other universes than our universe have always existed, and this can make us say that something other than those universes can have always existed, like the one that we call God.

More of my philosophy about the nature of our universe and the other universes..

I think i am smart, and i think that the nature of our universe is
that the lowest layer of the subatomic is also made of a kind of
"diversification", like in an Ant colony, and i think that this diversification comes from a kind of disorder from evolutive composition from the other universes that are disorder, but i think that there is a special thing to notice that for example the individual subatomic of time seems like made of disorder, but the composition of all the subatomic layer gives an emergence of order or intelligence like the time that we know it with its characteristic of being relative.

More of my philosophy about the distributed intelligence and more..

I think i am smart, so i think the intelligence of an Ant colony emerges from a "distributed" intelligence, so an individual Ant can be specialized like in our kind of civilization, but even if an Ant is specialized and he can be viewed as much less capable of constructing the intelligence of an Ant colony, the distributed intelligence of the Ant colony can make emerge the intelligence of an Ant colony, so i think that time is the same, the individual subatomic of time can be like more specialized, but all the subatomic layer can give emergence to time as we know it and to relativity of time.

More of my philosophy about what is time as we know it..

I think i am smart, and i think you know me much more now, and now
i will explain my point of view of what is time as we know it:

I think time that is relative as has said it Albert Einstein is an "emergence", so it is like an Ant colony, so if you look at an individual Ant in its colony you will like say that he is like disorder that will not be able to construct what constructs an Ant colony, so then the Ant colony is an "emergence" of intelligence, it is like the stomach of a human that is also an emergence of a kind of intelligence that knows how to process food, so i think time that is relative as has said it Einstein is also an "emergence", but when you look at time individually from the subatomic point of view you will like say that it is a disorder that can not construct the time that we know it, and it is by logical analogy like the example of the individual Ant above, but i think that the all subatomic layer has made "emerge" time as we know it, and it is like the emergence of intelligence of an Ant colony.



Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.