About social Liberalism and social democracy

[rami18]

Hello,

Social Liberals has pointed out to how global poverty, life expectancy,
opportunity and peace are all improving. So we have to take into account
this facts.

Now i will return to something important about social Liberalism and
social democracy..

I will like theorize more social Liberalism and social Democracy..

I have said the following about social Liberalism and social democracy,
read it carefully:

Nationalism of Donald Trump lack the heuristic of flexibility using
tolerance that get you more optimized, but social Liberalism of
democrates uses the flexibility of tolerance to optimize the economic
system and the social system, nationalism is like extreme justice of
communism that lack tolerance and that can hurt economic system and the
social system.

I have said about morality that:

Justice has to constrain happiness..

And responsability has to constrain justice..

But responsability is influenced by the variable of tolerance ,
so if we are more tolerance on responsability we can higher the consumer
confidence in you and we can attract more consumers and we can penetrate
more the market of others, this is the game of social Liberalism.

Social Liberalism of democrates wants also to play the card of tolerance
to attract consumers and to higher consumer confidence index and to be
able to penetrate more the market of others and to optimize better the
social system, nationalism doesn't undertand it well.

I give you an example, i have said:

About Machism..

Real machism is violence and it's more individualistic, and it's poor
Emotional intelligence.

So we can not be confident with machism..

Donald Trump is more machist..

The game is also giving first to be able to receive after..

Machism is not good at that..

Economy is also knowing how to give respect and compassion
and love to be able to higher the consumer confidence in you..

Security is also knowing how to give compassion and love and respect
to receive more security..

Machism is not good at that...

That's also the game Sir, and that's also Emotional intelligence.

So as you have noticed nationalism and machism are not good at
optimization with the flexibility of tolerance, but social Liberalism
and social democracy are good at it, so if you want for example to open
more the market of China to American goods and services, you have to
know how to be "tolerance" that knows how to give respect and compassion
to better receive in the future, and China has to know how to apply the
division of labour and how to apply Adam Smith's specialization Theory
to be more optimized.. so as you have noticed the flexibility of
tolerance plays the role of like an heuristic that optimize better the
economic system and social system.

Immigration is the same, social Liberalism and social Democracy uses
the heuristic of tolerance towards immigrants by for example accepting
arab immigrants even if arab immigrants are not as beautiful as white
europeans, and this is done to be able to optimize better the economic
system and social system with the flexibility of "tolerance".

And i have explained also to you about the heuristic of "tolerance" that:

Capitalism also wants to optimize, and capitalism says for example
that even arabs are not as beautiful as white europeans, it says that
arabs are tolerable, because capitalism wants to optimize economy
and the society by bringing arabs immigrants that are also decent
people, because today we are constrained by many factors, and
optimization has been rendered by those constrains to as the following:

If you are useful for something like jobs and economy or/and useful to
low birth rate of white europeans or/and you are useful to higher the
consumer confidence index and/or and you are useful to better the world
order and security , you can be welcome to USA or other countries..

About America and the world..

Before, operating systems like OS/2 of IBM were a monolithic OSs ,
but as the time has gone by we have developed more sophisticated
OSs like Mach 3 or Windows NT, those sophisticated OSs were more
decentralized and were designed in a such a way to be more efficient
and managed better, the difference between a monolithic one and not
monolithic one is like programming with message passing or Object
oriented programming, and we have also the tendency to decentralize the
management of our societies to be more efficient, it's the same
for capitalism , capitalism tries to optimize better by not
being as monolithic as the old way of thinking of Hitler, so
today because of constrains on optimization, usefulness is interpreted
not as being as beautiful as white europeans or being as civilized as
white europeans to better optimize the system economically.. it's
like decentralizing to better optimize, now to not get extremist,
you have to know how to tune correctly optimization to better optimize
and to not cause problems to societies.



Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

[rami18]

Hello,

Sorry, i have posted this in the wrong group.