On Jan 5, 9:25 am, Richard <
cavel...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> On 11/18/2012 5:14 AM,
n...@rtrussell.co.uk wrote:
> > (There's a spurious plus sign in the published listing).
> Don't think so, Russell...
What do you mean "don't think so"? The listing clearly has a typo in
line 2660:
2660 SR$=+ CHR$&83+" -1--2--3--4--5--6--7--8-"
The plus sign immediately following the equals is nonsense, and isn't
valid syntax in BBC BASIC. The code only makes sense if you omit that
plus sign:
2660 SR$= CHR$&83+" -1--2--3--4--5--6--7--8-"
Richard.
http://www.rtrussell.co.uk/