Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Basic

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Robert Wolfe

unread,
Jul 18, 2009, 9:51:03 AM7/18/09
to
On 3/5/2009 3:01 AM, stefan...@nospam.com wrote to All:

-> On Wed, 4 Mar 2009 21:59:09 -0500, "Bob Card"
<bob...@mindspring.com> wrote:
->
-> >Is BASIC available for the 64-bit version of Windows Vista? This is the
old
-> >BASIC from the 1980's...
->
-> As far as I can tell, there is no 64-bit BASIC dialect, but any 32-bit BASIC
dialect will run fine on Vista x64.
->
-> You may try the following dialects:
->
-> Run BASIC:
-> home page ... http://runbasic.com/
-> forum ........... http://runbasic.proboards82.com/
-> wiki .............. http://runbasic.wikispaces.com/
->
-> Just BASIC:
-> home page ... http://www.justbasic.com/
-> forum ........... http://justbasic.conforums.com/index.cgi
-> wiki .............. http://justbasic.wikispaces.com/
->
-> Liberty BASIC:
-> home page ... http://www.libertybasic.com/
-> forum ........... http://libertybasic.conforums.com/index.cgi
-> wiki .............. http://basic.wikispaces.com/
->
-> Download the 4.04 beta for Vista compatibility from
http://www.libertybasic.com/lb404b3setup.exe
->
-> FreeBASIC:
-> home page ... http://www.freebasic.net/
-> forum ........... http://www.freebasic.net/forum/
-> wiki .............. http://www.freebasic.net/wiki/wikka.php?wakka=FBWiki
->
-> ---
-> Stefan Pendl
->
-> Windows XP Pro SP 3
-> Celeron M 1.3 GHz
-> 752 MB DDR RAM

Let's not forget both Windows versions of PowerBASIC :)

Richard Russell

unread,
Jul 19, 2009, 5:31:19 AM7/19/09
to
On Jul 18, 2:51 pm, robert.wo...@robertwolfe.org (Robert Wolfe) wrote:
> Let's not forget both Windows versions of PowerBASIC :)

I don't think Stefan intended his list to be exhaustive; he is
somewhat prejudiced! I am similarly prejudiced (which is why I didn't
reply to the original post) but if we're in the business of listing 32-
bit BASICs which will work OK under Win64 I ought to mention:

BBC BASIC for Windows:
home page ... http://www.bb4w.com/
forum ....... http://bb4w.conforums.com/
wiki ........ http://bb4w.wikispaces.com/
group ....... http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bb4w/

Richard.
http://www.rtrussell.co.uk/
To reply by email change 'news' to my forename.

Tom Lake

unread,
Jul 20, 2009, 11:30:58 AM7/20/09
to
> I don't think Stefan intended his list to be exhaustive; he is
> somewhat prejudiced! I am similarly prejudiced (which is why I didn't
> reply to the original post) but if we're in the business of listing 32-
> bit BASICs which will work OK under Win64 I ought to mention:
>
> BBC BASIC for Windows:
> home page ... http://www.bb4w.com/

You're too modest! BBC BASIC for Windows is much more than just "OK"!

8^)

Tom Lake
No connection with the BBC BASIC, just a satisfied user.

0 new messages