But why would anyone want to have each message with its own subject line,
instead of being a thread under the same subject line? That is the question.
-- Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk
Wed, 12 Sep 2012 06:02:37 +0200, Steve Hayes did cat :
> But why would anyone want to have each message with its own subject line,
> instead of being a thread under the same subject line? That is the question.
well, for one you're talking about Chris Glur there, so some
turbulence may occur during conversation ;-)
Besides it allows him to show and spread the high functional level of
using Oberon and ubereditor...
> Wed, 12 Sep 2012 06:02:37 +0200, Steve Hayes did cat :
>> But why would anyone want to have each message with its own subject line,
>> instead of being a thread under the same subject line? That is the question.
> well, for one you're talking about Chris Glur there, so some
> turbulence may occur during conversation ;-)
> Besides it allows him to show and spread the high functional level of
> using Oberon and ubereditor...
I don't know Chris Glur, but I know that <no.top.p...@gmail.com> is on
my filter :-) (this must have had a reason). This is a much better
solution, and it was even better if this address was on Ed's filter too ;-)
Of course he refuses to give an example, because then you could see what
a fuss he's making out of nothing. He prefers to write a lot of words
spreading fog instead of giving one clarifiying example. Is that the
behaviour of someone who wants a problem solved?
And why is this thread in two newsgroups? What is linux specific here?
