Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
64-bit pipe dreams
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  Messages 51 - 52 of 52 - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals) < Older 
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Randall Hyde  
View profile  
 More options Feb 12 2002, 1:56 pm
Newsgroups: comp.lang.asm.x86
From: "Randall Hyde" <rh...@cs.ucr.edu>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 17:55:57 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Tues, Feb 12 2002 12:55 pm
Subject: Re: 64-bit pipe dreams

Beth wrote in message ...

[snipped]

Most likely, the software developers are too lazy
to figure out the minimum machine it will run on
and they just state the specifications of their
development or test machines.
Randy Hyde
p.s. It could also be that they simply don't have
access to lower performance machines in order
to run their tests, so they specify the lowest
performing machine they own.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
LocalFolk  
View profile  
 More options Feb 24 2002, 5:55 pm
Newsgroups: comp.lang.asm.x86
From: localf...@aol.com (LocalFolk)
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 21:55:52 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Sun, Feb 24 2002 4:55 pm
Subject: Re: 64-bit pipe dreams
Actually, having been a developer on a team
that shrink-wrapped a product or two, I can relate.

Yes.  Not having 75 different PCs in your test
bed is a major reason, as is the laziness factor.
Or, more approproately, prioritization of effort.

But the big reason for not finding an absolute
minimum configuration and printing that as the
requirement, is the all-too-common occurance
of someone with those exact specs who happens
to be running a web server or a company database
on the same machine as the one you spec'ed.

So to avoid requirements like:
"PII 400MHz, 64M, 2G (75M free), unless you are
running a webserver concurrently, in which case
it's PIII 600MHz,128M, 4G (100M free) or  if you
are running a company database, in which case
it's PIII 450MHz, 64M, 20G (2G free), etc, etc,
yadda yadda yadda..."

To avoid that, the requirements guys usually leave
a little slack in the requirement.  The reason is
not, I assure you, to push PCs for Uncle Bill.

-uncle bear


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages < Older 
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »