Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
comp.lang.apl
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
best parallel array language
Options
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
   5 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
rusi  
View profile  
 More options Oct 19 2012, 3:12 am
Newsgroups: comp.lang.apl
From: rusi <rustompm...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:12:42 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Oct 19 2012 3:12 am
Subject: best parallel array language
Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
Are there any Apls (or related array languages like J) which have good
parallel implementations?

Googling around I find http://www.cs.trinity.edu/~jhowland/leave/leave/
but it does not seem implemented.

And there is K http://www.kx.com/

Any others?


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Aaron W. Hsu  
View profile  
 More options Oct 19 2012, 8:42 pm
Newsgroups: comp.lang.apl
From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcf...@sacrideo.us>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 20:42:56 -0400
Local: Fri, Oct 19 2012 8:42 pm
Subject: Re: best parallel array language
Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 03:12:42 -0400, rusi <rustompm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Are there any Apls (or related array languages like J) which have good
> parallel implementations?

> Googling around I find http://www.cs.trinity.edu/~jhowland/leave/leave/
> but it does not seem implemented.

> And there is K http://www.kx.com/

> Any others?

I am currently in the process of creating a high-performance, parallel APL  
as my research. I anticipate having something that people can use and play  
with sometime next year. It will basically be APL.

--
Aaron W. Hsu | arcf...@sacrideo.us | http://www.sacrideo.us
Programming is just another word for the Lost Art of Thinking.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
rusi  
View profile  
 More options Oct 21 2012, 1:16 am
Newsgroups: comp.lang.apl
From: rusi <rustompm...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 22:16:16 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Oct 21 2012 1:16 am
Subject: Re: best parallel array language
Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
On Oct 20, 5:42 am, "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcf...@sacrideo.us> wrote:

> On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 03:12:42 -0400, rusi <rustompm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Are there any Apls (or related array languages like J) which have good
> > parallel implementations?

> > Googling around I findhttp://www.cs.trinity.edu/~jhowland/leave/leave/
> > but it does not seem implemented.

> > And there is Khttp://www.kx.com/

> > Any others?

> I am currently in the process of creating a high-performance, parallel APL
> as my research. I anticipate having something that people can use and play
> with sometime next year. It will basically be APL.

Please let me know when it materializes.
Any chance in next 6 months?

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Aaron W. Hsu  
View profile  
 More options Oct 22 2012, 12:32 am
Newsgroups: comp.lang.apl
From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcf...@sacrideo.us>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 00:32:00 -0400
Subject: Re: best parallel array language
Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 01:16:16 -0400, rusi <rustompm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please let me know when it materializes.
> Any chance in next 6 months?

There is a good chance that I will have something up by then. Could you  
let me know a bit more about what you are hoping to do with such a  
parallel APL?

--
Aaron W. Hsu | arcf...@sacrideo.us | http://www.sacrideo.us
Programming is just another word for the Lost Art of Thinking.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
rusi  
View profile  
 More options Oct 22 2012, 1:18 am
Newsgroups: comp.lang.apl
From: rusi <rustompm...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 22:18:41 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, Oct 22 2012 1:18 am
Subject: Re: best parallel array language
Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
On Oct 22, 9:32 am, "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcf...@sacrideo.us> wrote:

> On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 01:16:16 -0400, rusi <rustompm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Please let me know when it materializes.
> > Any chance in next 6 months?

> There is a good chance that I will have something up by then. Could you
> let me know a bit more about what you are hoping to do with such a
> parallel APL?

> --
> Aaron W. Hsu | arcf...@sacrideo.us |http://www.sacrideo.us
> Programming is just another word for the Lost Art of Thinking.

We have to deliver in about 7-8 months -- the chosen language is
Erlang. Because I am an old functional programmer -- Lisp, Haskell and
its predecessors, (a bit of Apl) -- I am on the team.  However I
suspect that the choice has been made without regard to the difference
between concurrency and parallelism (eg
http://existentialtype.wordpress.com/2011/03/17/parallelism-is-not-co...
)

So having a well-thought properly implemented (data)parallel language
would probably help to point out in pragmatic terms the issues.

And so...  my question of '6 months' is not really accurate -- if we
dont have it now, its probably not much use for this project :-)

Anyway thanks again for offering.  Maybe for some other project??


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google