Description:
Discussion about Ada*.
|
|
|
ASN.1 to Ada?
|
| |
Are there any Open Source ASN.1 to Ada compilers out there?
Or do I need to do the odious task myself?
Thanks for any pointers.
|
|
ADASTUDIO 2013
|
| |
Adastudio 2013 is consist of two iso filese and contants
1. qt5ada
2. vtk5ada
3. vad
4 prebuilded QT5 (win32,x86)
5. Prebuilded VTK 5.10.1 with QT5 (win32,x86)
Attention !!! QT5 in win32 is configured
E:\qt\5.0.0 - qt 5.0.2
E:\qt\5.1 - qt 5.1.0.beta
VTK5 in win32 is configured on... more »
|
|
Software Integration Survey
|
| |
Hi all,
We are conducting an academic research to improve tools for software integration. If you maintain a project with multiple contributors, we will greatly appreciate your participation.
Your answers will be used for research purposes and to support the development of new tools. You can later access the results of this study, make free use of our tools to support the integration of changes, and maybe receive a gift.... more »
|
|
User defined type conversion
|
| |
Hi Folks,
I have a problem with a type conversion. Hereby is what I'm trying to do:
type AB is tagged
record
A : Unsigned_16;
B : Unsigned_16;
end record;
type abcde is tagged
record
a: Unsigned_8;
b: Unsigned_8;
c: Unsigned_8;
d: Unsigned_8;
end record;... more »
|
|
do ada tasks run accross 16 cpu boxs? or stuck on 1 cpu?
|
| |
How would an ada program use 16 core box?
Are the tasks green threads? meaning 1 cpu microthreads? or are they somehow green threads than can run on 16 cpus at same time? or are they like os threads and heavy?
I think they are the best combo green threads than can use N cpus by being farmed out to all avaialble cpu as wrokers cpus .... but not sure..... more »
|
|
How to flag implicit conversions?
|
| |
Hi once again,
Yesterday I encountered an issue with a thankfully range‑check‑enabled compiled application, involving implicit conversion from universal_integer. This occurred in an expression as an argument to a function, and the range error disappeared when I added a type qualification. To avoid any similar future case, I would like to flag this... more »
|
|
|