On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 21:58:06 +0200, Magnus Warker wrote:They were just a bit ahead of their time, I suppose :-) .
> On 09/21/2012 07:31 PM, Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
>> 2012-09-21 20:24, Magnus Warker wrote:
>>> As I wrote, there is no data.
>> Then you have nothing to layout, nothing to style.
> This is a stupid conclusion.
> It was in the 90s when people built layouts using html tables.
> ... And it'sExcept, of course, when the content *is* the layout :-) .
> also common sense to separate layout from content.
> It's not "religion", but a structured view on the world.As structured view on the world? That's not a faith? a religion?
> ... You seem toOr you, o[f|n] religions :-) .
> have a very simplified view on the world.
> I really wonder why this group is called "stylesheets"...It's where to come for stylesheet advice, where appropriate, or for
whatever other advice may unexpectedly prove to be more appropriate.
Even a gastro-enterological surgeon is wise to refrain from operating on
> MagnusHTH. Cheers, -- tlvp
Avant de repondre, jeter la poubelle, SVP.
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.