Suppose this rule:
span {font: 32px caption;}
According to you, is this CSS rule valid, legal?
URL to test this:
http://www.gtalbot.org/Stylesheets/font-shorthand-system-font-validator-bug.css
Relevant spec:
Section 15.8 states:
"
'font'
Value: [ [ <'font-style'> || <'font-variant'> || <'font-
weight'> ]?
<'font-size'> [ / <'line-height'> ]? <'font-family'> ] | caption |
icon | menu
| message-box | small-caption | status-bar | inherit
(...)
System fonts may only be set as a whole; that is, the font family,
size,
weight, style, etc. are all set at the same time. These values may
then be
altered individually if desired.
"
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/fonts.html#font-shorthand
Section 1.4.2.1 states:
"
A bar (|) separates two or more alternatives: exactly one of them must
occur.
"
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/about.html#value-defs
season's greetings,
Gérard
Could be ambiguous: a font named "caption" could exist, and how would
the parser know whether the font or the keyword is intended?
I am not a fan of sort-cut syntaxes which catenate a bunch or properties
together: this can cause a problem for old browsers; and it makes it
harder to forsee syntax errors.
By quoting caption (and other system font reserved names). Just like
it is done for ...
"
Font family names that happen to be the same as a keyword value
('inherit', 'serif', 'sans-serif', 'monospace', 'fantasy', and
'cursive') must be quoted to prevent confusion with the keywords with
the same names.
"
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/fonts.html#font-family-prop
season's greetings, Gérard