TIA
--
Sandy
-
Sandy Burton
Whitburn,West Lothian, UK
Web sites: http://www.aburton.freeserve.co.uk
o Ancient Places - unique photographs of ancient Scottish and Cornish
monuments
http://www.whitburnjuniors.fsnet.co.uk
o Whitburn Junior FC - News and information about the team.
> I have been slaving over a hot keyboard for a number of weeks now and would
> appreciate some thoughts on my two sites.
And they are ?
:S:
I took a quick look around and these are some things I noticed:
first link (ancient places)
1. counter - needs out
2. enter button - same
3. the body font size is fixed in size and not changeable, the rest is
not.
4. pop-up, no-no.
5. header "Ancient places" looks bad imho.
6. different bg on the varius pages, consider "harmonizing".
second link (Whiteburn...)
1. script error line 69 on entry (im using IE5.0)
2. Same enter button - same comment.
3. same problem with font sizing.
4. background makes it somewhat difficult to read, though you did
choose the best font for that situation.
5. counter - still a passe idea.
6. frames? why? do you realize that search engines will pass you by?
7. nice flow and layout, the nav bar is nice.
thats about it, hope I could help.
On Sat, 17 Jun 2000 02:57:40 +0100, "Alexander Burton"
<mrbu...@callnet0800.com> wrote:
>I have been slaving over a hot keyboard for a number of weeks now and would
>appreciate some thoughts on my two sites.
>
>TIA
In the sig style...
--
Bartek Kostrzewa -- bar...@pt.lu
http://technoage.web.lu
-----------------------
life is only a hoax
and
www.whitburnjuniors.fsnet.co.uk
Sorry.
Sandy
Stylewriter <Style...@ack.com> wrote in message
news:1eceff6.aa3d6zlhldc0N%Style...@ack.com...
The site looks very plain. Although I like plain sites, this is a bit
too much.
The pages for the different monuments, and everything beyond the index
page have a not so good-looking bg coulour.
The content, all in all is well documented and photographed, jut not
presented in a way that it appears well.
Take a look at www.lokigames.com, although it's a games site, your logo
could look similar, just with a pic of Scotland in it and a Scottish
rune.
All in all the content is great, but you'll need to improve the overall
design a bit, it's not fancy enough at my opinion, and you should change
the bg coulour.
> http://www.whitburnjuniors.fsnet.co.uk
> o Whitburn Junior FC - News and information about the team.
Well, a junior football team and TONS of text are not something that
should be there. Less text, more fun at my opinion. Pics of matches, a
little history here and there.
The bg is well chosen, but should not be used everywhere I think, make a
translation from left (background image) to the plain colour in the
right frame.
> In the sig style...
Ah.
Can't be bothered acting like a detective. If he want's a crit. let him
make a small efffort at least.
:S:
:)
Alexander, i hope these comments help you out:
I think the use of Time-Roman isn't good. It looks well printed out, but
doesn't look so hot on-screen. Using Times-Roman on the web (and a lot of
big name places do) is akin to watching a 1970's documentary on
photosynthesis --- honest enough representation of life, but oh-so
boring. Leave the world of your grandma behind, and embrace the New World
(had to stick an Americanism in there somewhere!) -- use arial, verdana,
or helvetica.
More pictures!
Alexander Burton wrote:
>
>
> I have been slaving over a hot keyboard for a number of weeks now and
would
> appreciate some thoughts on my two sites.
>
> TIA
> --
> Sandy
> -
> Sandy Burton
> Whitburn,West Lothian, UK
> Web sites: http://www.aburton.freeserve.co.uk
> o Ancient Places - unique photographs of ancient Scottish and Cornish
> monuments
> http://www.whitburnjuniors.fsnet.co.uk
> o Whitburn Junior FC - News and information about the team.
>
>
>
--
Posted via CNET Help.com
http://www.help.com/
Thanks,
Sandy
Robert Adams <webm...@egoz.org> wrote in message
news:sksbjf5...@corp.supernews.com...
In case you're not aware, you can ask for a list of fonts in decreasing
preference. In CSS:
font-family: "comic sans ms", verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif;
This asks for Comic Sans if available, otherwise Verdana, then Arial
(Windows "standard" sans-serif font), then Helvetica (standard sans font on
many other platforms), and as a last resort, use some system-defined
sans-serif font.
>Thanks for the interesting point re the choice of font. I originally used
>Comic sans, but found that it didn't render properly with some
>browser/platform combinations. Thought that Times was pretty standard, but
>again there are other standard fonts.
>I'll look into it....
If the font you use isn't that important to you, why specify it at
all?
Jon
I used frames btw as an exercise, without any regard to SE (as I was
ignorant of this at the time). Having taken advice, the structure of the
site is supposed to be more SE friendly. The other site is not framed. I'll
keep both approaches active I think.
On the background to the Arch site, it should appear on all pages since I am
using a style sheet. I have had cross browser problems with this before -
thought I had solved them, maybe not.
BTW Stylewriter comments that he is not inclined to do detective work to
find the addresses - although I didn't explicitly say that they were in the
sig, I'm not sure that they were that hard to find.
Once again, thanks. Your help was appreciated.