Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Reinventing History (was: Introduction to HTML 3.2 (PostScript))
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Arjun Ray  
View profile  
 More options Dec 23 1996, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html
From: a...@nmds.com (Arjun Ray)
Date: 1996/12/23
Subject: Reinventing History (was: Introduction to HTML 3.2 (PostScript))

In <Pine.HPP.3.95.961222170314.8814C-100...@hpplus05.cern.ch>,
"Alan J. Flavell" <flav...@mail.cern.ch> writes:
| On Sat, 21 Dec 1996, Arjun Ray wrote:

|> The "history" that places 2.0, 3.0 and 3.2 in a unified sequence is
|> bogus.

| Quite so.  How sad to see history re-invented within a mere couple
| of years.

It's known as Spin Control. Consider the latest agonism over Netscape
and stylesheets. Naturally, The Official Hagiography will need to be
some convenient and comfortable story, perhaps like this:

(From
http://home.netscape.com/comprod/products/communicator/guide.html)

= Style sheets. In the past, Web page designers wishing to affect
= aspects of page design such as colors and text sizes had to write
= HTML tags for each element. With style sheets, designers not only
= get complete control over these elements, they also can build a
= style sheet standard that can be leveraged repeatedly (similar to a
= template).

In the past? HTML tags? Really? Why was that? Who invented <FONT>?

Here's the history that must not come to light:

1. Oct 13 1994 - Marc A. announces the first beta of Netscape 0.9:
     http://www.eit.com/www.lists/www-talk.1994q4/0187.html

2. Oct 10 1994 - Hakon Lie announces the first public draft of CSS:
     http://www.eit.com/www.lists/www-talk.1994q4/0153.html

That's right, folks, Cascading Style Sheets are at least *that* old.
And surely a draft was the result of prior discussions, no?

3. Oct 14 1994 - Marc A. clarifies some time lines:
 http://www.acl.lanl.gov/HTML_WG/html-wg-94q4.messages/0088.html

= we started the company April 4, hired the core staff in April and
= May, started coding June 1, entered alpha/beta around Sep 1, and
= just released to the net -- things have been a bit hectic :-).

Doing what, one wonders, given that stylesheets had been *the* topic
of discussion since 1993 on the www-talk and www-html mailing lists:
   http://www.eit.com/www.lists/

4. May 31 1994 - Dave Raggett refers everyone to the proceedings at
WWW'94 (where, BTW, HTML+ became HTML 3.0):
   http://www.eit.com/www.lists/www-html.1994q2/0012.html

5. May 25-27 1994 - The First International Conference on the WWW:
   http://www.eit.com/www.lists/www-talk.1993q4/0898.html

During that summer, the media blitz over "Jim Clark and the Mosaic
boys" had been relentless. Would such "talent" find a way to support
stylesheets?

Nope. With fanfare, flourish and folderol, <CENTER> and <FONT> came
into the world...

= In the past, Web page designers wishing to affect aspects of page
= design such as colors and text sizes had to write HTML tags for each
= element.

Humbug? Disingenuousness? Of course not! Stylesheets are new! The
Official Hagiographies will all say so!

:ar


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.