On 2013-04-22, unruh <
un...@invalid.ca> wrote:
> I was posting a page that I had edited in gimp to a web page
>
www.theory.physics.ubc.ca/soundcards.html
>
> If you look at most of the pictures, the blue is blue. But on the second
> picture after the subtitle
> Behringer UCA222 Performance
> the blue has become a purple.
> If I look at that image in gimp or in xv, the blue is blue, but on at
> least my web browser (Firefox 16.02) what is supposed to be blue (the
> play and record buttons, the left power bar, the second graph from top
> on the right side) it looks purple.
On further tests, the above seems to be limited to Firefox. Both
Konqueror and Opera see the blue as blue (and for all I know, other
versions of Firefox do as well, but I have tested with at least two.)
What I find puzzling is how a png file made by gimp can be
misinterpreted in its colours by anything, Firefox included. The other
files were screen images made by ksnapshot, and cropped by xv. That one
was made by ksnapshot and cropped by gimp.
Note that there is also something strange in the xv cropped ones, in
that the resolution seems to be changed by xv. Note that the lines in
the graphs (esp the top graph) are broken. That was NOT in the original.
It was introduced by xv.
So, how can gimp produce a png file such that its colours could be
misinterpreted by Firefox?