From: guc...@math.fu-berlin.de (Sven Guckes)
Subject: Re: nano - first tests
Date: 2000/02/03
Message-ID: <87chle$3f46b$1@fu-berlin.de>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 581180344
X-Old-Subject: Re: pico isn't open source - a small difference, however small
References: <879l9m$3gg6k$3@fu-berlin.de> <Pine.A41.4.21.0002021427490.49894-100000@gnu.uvm.edu> <Pine.OSF.4.21.0002021305420.6183-100000@goedel1.math.washington.edu> <Cx1m4.57804$zU5.784251@wbnws01.ne.mediaone.net> <ck4m4.5678$d61.174279@news6.giganews.com> <87butk$3k30d$1@fu-berlin.de> <Pine.LNX.3.96.1000203063336.359C-100000@localhost>
X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 949602798 3641547 160.45.41.21 (16 17 19)
Organization: Freie Universitaet Berlin
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.5.7 (UNIX)
Reply-To: guckes-n...@math.fu-berlin.de
Newsgroups: comp.editors

* Pat Pridgen <p...@uwtc.net>:
> > So - has anyone of you guys installed nano yet?
> I was going to give it a try, but...it wants a greater
> glibc than I have.  I'm running RedHat 5.2. The same
> problem I have with a couple of other programs.

Sounds like you should upgrade then.  :-)

Sven  [all in favor of "greater libs"]

-- 
  nano 0.8.1                     New Buffer
   
^O Write Out ^_ Goto Line ^R Read File ^Y Prev Page ^K Cut Text  ^C Cur Pos
^X Exit      ^\ Replace   ^W Where Is  ^V Next Page ^U Uncut Txt ^T To Spell