Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Relationship between a functions derivitives and BW?

Received: by 10.66.72.134 with SMTP id d6mr709059pav.20.1352233296748;
        Tue, 06 Nov 2012 12:21:36 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Path: 6ni66136pbd.1!nntp.google.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 14:21:36 -0600
From: "westocl" <31050@dsprelated>
Newsgroups: comp.dsp
References: <Fu-dnak-p5nrGQzNnZ2dnUVZ_vadnZ2d@giganews.com> <0ZadnZKqnbCb1gjNnZ2dnUVZ_tWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <BZWdnaGiBJJZ6gjNnZ2dnUVZ_qGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <duidnaKZ1YZepwvNnZ2dnUVZ_uWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
User-Agent: DSPRelated.com usenet HTML frontend
X-Remote-Host: 146.15.96.20
Subject: Re: Relationship between a functions derivitives and BW?
Message-ID: <3OKdnVfd8p7N7ATNnZ2dnUVZ_gadnZ2d@giganews.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 14:21:36 -0600
Lines: 71
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-jdGuMRVqoWVVYOtlzmBuXikXdT2LmSWfqws1pHjfu8TxKW7qnvu/K9EvLkQBjVuogqlEVyf75uX3lBn!BW1+905cXHc0lDrNpkG9TGvTvLbg1njA3PNHXUwoi/SJoZ18Aonsipu01CM1DHJDhOFM6U3eJijY
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 2905
X-Original-Lines: 69
X-Original-Bytes: 2822

>>>>Quick question for you guys...
>>>>
>>>>Is there any relationship between constraining a functions derivitives
>>>and
>>>>constraining its bandwith?
>>>>
>>>>For example, if we were to consider the output of a lowpass random
>>>>process... call it x_lp[n]. One could argue that that sequence must be
>>>>'smooth' by some account. (how smooth has to do with the lowpass
>>bandwith
>>>>of the process)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>x_lp[n] 'smoothness' should also be able to be described by the
>>functions
>>>>derivitives either existing or also being continuous.  Is there a
>>>straight
>>>>forward relationship?
>>>>
>>>>thanks in advance
>>>>
>>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>There is a fundamental inequality, called Bernstein's inequality, that
>>>seems to be what you are looking for. If a signal s(t) has two-sided
>>>bandwidth B and is bounded on the time domain by a constant A>0, then
it
>>>holds that
>>>
>>>  |s'(t)|<= pi * A B/2.
>>>
>>>The signal attaining the bound is A*sin(pi*B*t+phi), where phi is any
>>>phase. For the n-th order derivative, it is
>>>
>>>  |s^(n)(t)|<= (pi*B/2)^(n-1) A.
>>>
>>>I hope this helps.
>>>
>>>Jesus. 
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Ups, the last inequality is
>>
>>|s^(n)(t)|<= (pi*B/2)^n A.
>>
>>Jesus.
>>
>>
>
>Sorry, another correction. The inequalities are
>
>|s'(t)|<= pi * A B/2
>
>and
>
>|s^(n)(t)|<= (pi*B)^n A.
>
>Jesus.
>
>


Thanks!!
I will explore this.

There was a little talk as to whether this result only holds for the
continuous case or not. Does this result hold for the discrete case also
where i can conclude x[n+1] - x[n] is bounded by (pi * A B/2)??

If so, this is a pretty neat result.