Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that of Date & Darwin? [M.Gittens]
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Jan Hidders  
View profile  
 More options Jun 4 2005, 5:30 am
Newsgroups: comp.databases.theory
From: Jan Hidders <jan.hidd...@REMOVETHIS.pandora.be>
Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 09:30:15 GMT
Local: Sat, Jun 4 2005 5:30 am
Subject: Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that of Date & Darwin? [M.Gittens]

mountain man wrote:

> There have been, there are,
> and there always will be
> NULLS in the real world.

NULLs are an abstraction and like all abstractions they do not really
exist. The relevant question here is if they are necessary and useful to
describe the world.

> Does this fact not conflict
> with Date's wants, and if
> so, why does Date want
> to ignore them?

They unnecessarily complicate the model. Anything that can be modeled
with them can also be modeled without them, and to the extent that they
are convenient this is mostly due to the fact that the possibilities for
user-defined domains were too restricted.

-- Jan Hidders


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.