From: jmo...@src.si (Jurij Modic)
Subject: Re: SQL Question
Date: 1998/09/18
Message-ID: <36025f83.28385199@news.siol.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 392399226
References: <6tnt6o$i61$1@imsp009a.netvigator.com> <35ff7f56.9689192@news.siol.net> <6tqgkt$mk8$1@imsp009a.netvigator.com> <3600cedc.9831704@news.siol.net> <6tsebo$vml$2@imsp009a.netvigator.com> <3601f53c.1174237@news.siol.net> <6tt0b2$n76$1@imsp009a.netvigator.com>
Organization: SRC d.o.o, Ljubljana, Slovenia
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 1998 15:30:08 MET DST
Newsgroups: comp.databases.sybase,comp.databases.ms-sqlserver,comp.databases.oracle.server

On 18 Sep 1998 06:58:42 GMT, paulk...@news.netvigator.com (Ng K C
Paul) wrote:

>Is there any performance difference in using permanent view and temporary 
>inline view?

No, I don't think so (ther might be some minimal differences during
the parsing phase, but I belive you can neglect them).

Regards,
--
Jurij Modic <jmo...@src.si>
Certified Oracle7 DBA (OCP)
================================================
The above opinions are mine and do not represent
any official standpoints of my employer