Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Updating MV Family Tree
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Rob Allen  
View profile  
 More options Dec 2 2005, 3:11 pm
Newsgroups: comp.databases.pick
From: "Rob Allen" <robertwallen2...@yahoo.com>
Date: 2 Dec 2005 12:11:22 -0800
Local: Fri, Dec 2 2005 3:11 pm
Subject: Re: Updating MV Family Tree

dawn wrote:
> Do you call it "Reality"?  I wasn't sure, so I simply have the company
> name and not the product name in the poster.  What do you call basic
> and query?

Well, it isn't really a product that we sell, it's just the environment
where our core applications run. Internally, we call it Reality or
CoRA; basic is Data/Basic, and the query language is English. I think
"CoRA" originated as McDonnell-Douglas' internal project name for the
Reality-on-Unix product, later named RealityX and now just Reality.
It's an acronym for "Common Reality Architecture" or something like
that.

> > There hasn't been a serious attempt
> > to replace Reality since they stopped the jBASE project in 1996,

> any stories related to that project?

It was known internally as "the CoRA Bridge" that would take us over to
the Unix world. When we first looked at jBASE, they had the ability to
take Data/Basic programs and turn them into C programs. At our
insistence, they added the option to go to C++ also. Then management
decided that the payoff wasn't there, so they pulled the plug on the
project and we stayed with CoRA.

> I considered others, such as the first Intel port, but that was muddied
> by the board that could be slipped into an AT.  It was an Intel port,
> but not a DOS port and I didn't know how to handle it.  At this point,
> I forget whether the first product running on Intel was from Pick
> Systems or elsewhere.  I also don't know who did the first DOS port -
> Revelation, perhaps?

Revelation and CDI-1000 were almost simultaneous DOS ports. The latter
disappeared quickly. I think CDI is the company that also did the IBM
Series/1 port. Here's another little-remembered product: in the early
80s, McDonnell-Douglas licensed Revelation, tweaked it to resemble
Reality, and sold it on PCs from Convergent Technologies. They named
it the "M-1000" system. The base OS was Convergent's CTOS, which had a
DOS emulation in which they ran Revelation, which was a Pick emulation.
Lots of chances for things to go wrong... and they did.

The first native Intel implementation I know of was the Altos 586,
which was done around 1983-84. We resold them in the now-defunct ADP
Accounting Services division; Dealer Services never sold anything but
Reality. Accounting Services had previously sold ADDS Mentors too. A
couple of years later, Pick Systems came out with their PC-XT version.
We got a copy to evaluate but didn't see it fitting our needs.

Rob Allen


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.