Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server
From: Charles Hooper <hooperc2...@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 04:28:46 -0700
Local: Fri, Aug 10 2007 7:28 am
Subject: Re: Oracle 10g on Windows 2003 x64 Memory Useage
On Aug 9, 6:14 pm, "Paul Linehan" <plinehan__A@T__yahoo__D.OT__COM>
wrote: > Charles Hooper wrote: Thanks for the suggestion - I have not experimented with that utility > > Have you enabled large page support on Windows and Oracle, which > > causes Windows to use 4MB memory page sizes rather than 4KB memory > > pages? If so, I suspect that Performance Monitor is showing incorrect > > information. I am running Oracle 10.2.0.2 on Windows 2003 x64, total > > page file size for all drives is configured at 3124MB, yet Task > > Manager reports that PF usage is 13.3GB. In my case, system > > performance is great, so I am not too concerned about the inconsistent > > numbers. > > Have you verified that the page file is actually 10GB in size? > I have read quite a few of your posts and I think > a) you know what you're talking about > and > b) you genuinely try to help people. > I hope that this info can help you and/or others. > For Windows, there is a nifty/cool/rad/awesome(for Yanks > Go towww.sysinternals.comand go for procexp (process > Inconsistent numbers should not happen. The site also > Paul... in quite a while. Looking at the page file on the hard drive, it is currently at Process Explorer: (recorded roughly 60 seconds after the above) Comparing the numbers between Process Explorer (now a Microsoft -or- 12,974,124KB physical memory in use I *suspect* that the problem has to do with the memory page size being Charles Hooper You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||