Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
comp.databases.oracle.server
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion Oracle 10g on Windows 2003 x64 Memory Useage
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Paul Linehan  
View profile  
 More options Aug 9 2007, 6:14 pm
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server
From: "Paul Linehan" <plinehan__A@T__yahoo__D.OT__COM>
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2007 22:14:05 GMT
Local: Thurs, Aug 9 2007 6:14 pm
Subject: Re: Oracle 10g on Windows 2003 x64 Memory Useage
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

Charles Hooper wrote:
> Have you enabled large page support on Windows and Oracle, which
> causes Windows to use 4MB memory page sizes rather than 4KB memory
> pages?  If so, I suspect that Performance Monitor is showing incorrect
> information.  I am running Oracle 10.2.0.2 on Windows 2003 x64, total
> page file size for all drives is configured at 3124MB, yet Task
> Manager reports that PF usage is 13.3GB.  In my case, system
> performance is great, so I am not too concerned about the inconsistent
> numbers.
> Have you verified that the page file is actually 10GB in size?

I have read quite a few of your posts and I think
that:

a) you know what you're talking about

and

b) you genuinely try to help people.

I hope that this info can help you and/or others.

For Windows, there is a nifty/cool/rad/awesome(for Yanks
only) - (choose term which hasn't gone out of fashion, or
better yet, the one which has come back into fashion!!)

Go to www.sysinternals.com and go for procexp (process
explorer).exe - it gives more reliable results than
the Windows performance monitor.

Inconsistent numbers should not happen. The site also
has a number of other useful bits and bobs for anyone
concerned with performance.

Paul...

> Charles Hooper


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2012 Google