The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server
From: Toni Schmidbauer <t...@stderror.at>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 00:38:49 +0200
Local: Wed, Apr 16 2008 6:38 pm
Subject: Re: Why does ASMLib support linux platform only?
At Mon, 14 Apr 2008 20:44:48 -0700 (PDT),
Woody Ling wrote: don't know about performance, but i think the main reason for asmlib > I read many articles which said that ASMLib disk can provide better > performance and easy of management than using RAW devices to form ASM > disk group. Why does ASMLib support linux platform only if it is > better? Raw devices are good enough for building ASM disk grouop in > other platforms such as AIX? is/was persistent device naming under linux. in pre 2.6/udev times there was now way to pin down a certain scsi lun to a fixed /dev entry. for example if you had 3 scsi disks sda, sdb and sdc and you removed also with asmlib you do not need to configure raw devices, which makes nowadays, with the help of udev and O_DIRECT used by oracle its not hth You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||