Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
bLOCKRECOVER in 11G?
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  12 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Mladen Gogala  
View profile  
 More options Aug 17 2012, 11:00 am
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server
From: Mladen Gogala <gogala.mla...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:00:02 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Fri, Aug 17 2012 11:00 am
Subject: bLOCKRECOVER in 11G?
I've had some brief corruption caused by sunspots (actually, it was a
proof of concept DR test, the corrupt blocks were caused by NOLOGGING
operations) and I decided to repair blocks by using BLOCKRECOVER
CORRUPTION LIST. The database version is 11.2. Everything worked as
planned. I then went to check the RMAN manual for 11G and BLOCKRECOVER
command is no longer there, it is replaced by the new options to RECOVER
commands. However, BLOCKRECOVER still works as a charm. So does "BACKUP
VALIDATE" which was superseded by the VALIDATE command. Oh well, the old
dog is learning the new terminology for the old tricks. VALIDATE command
in 11G produces a beautiful report:

RMAN> validate database;

Starting validate at 2012-08-17 10:43:38
using channel ORA_DISK_1
channel ORA_DISK_1: starting validation of datafile
channel ORA_DISK_1: specifying datafile(s) for validation
input datafile file number=00007 name=/data/oracle/data/O11/test_lob.dbf
input datafile file number=00001 name=/data/oracle/data/O11/system01.dbf
input datafile file number=00002 name=/data/oracle/data/O11/sysaux01.dbf
input datafile file number=00006 name=/data/oracle/data/O11/test_tbs.dbf
input datafile file number=00003 name=/data/oracle/data/O11/undotbs01.dbf
input datafile file number=00005 name=/data/oracle/data/O11/example01.dbf
input datafile file number=00004 name=/data/oracle/data/O11/users01.dbf
channel ORA_DISK_1: validation complete, elapsed time: 00:03:15
List of Datafiles
=================
File Status Marked Corrupt Empty Blocks Blocks Examined High SCN
---- ------ -------------- ------------ --------------- ----------
1    OK     0              246114       327720          2715101  
  File Name: /data/oracle/data/O11/system01.dbf
  Block Type Blocks Failing Blocks Processed
  ---------- -------------- ----------------
  Data       0              62724          
  Index      0              13756          
  Other      0              5086            

File Status Marked Corrupt Empty Blocks Blocks Examined High SCN
---- ------ -------------- ------------ --------------- ----------
2    OK     0              257793       327682          2715099  
  File Name: /data/oracle/data/O11/sysaux01.dbf
  Block Type Blocks Failing Blocks Processed
  ---------- -------------- ----------------
  Data       0              19854          
  Index      0              18063          
  Other      0              31970          

File Status Marked Corrupt Empty Blocks Blocks Examined High SCN
---- ------ -------------- ------------ --------------- ----------
3    OK     0              13977        65536           2715101  
  File Name: /data/oracle/data/O11/undotbs01.dbf
  Block Type Blocks Failing Blocks Processed
  ---------- -------------- ----------------
  Data       0              0              
  Index      0              0              
  Other      0              51559          

File Status Marked Corrupt Empty Blocks Blocks Examined High SCN
---- ------ -------------- ------------ --------------- ----------
4    OK     0              30623        32795           2624870  
  File Name: /data/oracle/data/O11/users01.dbf
  Block Type Blocks Failing Blocks Processed
  ---------- -------------- ----------------
  Data       0              523            
  Index      0              100            
  Other      0              1522            

File Status Marked Corrupt Empty Blocks Blocks Examined High SCN
---- ------ -------------- ------------ --------------- ----------
5    OK     0              54947        65537           2675272  
  File Name: /data/oracle/data/O11/example01.dbf
  Block Type Blocks Failing Blocks Processed
  ---------- -------------- ----------------
  Data       0              6600            
  Index      0              1148            
  Other      0              2841            

File Status Marked Corrupt Empty Blocks Blocks Examined High SCN
---- ------ -------------- ------------ --------------- ----------
6    OK     0              261993       262144          1900091  
  File Name: /data/oracle/data/O11/test_tbs.dbf
  Block Type Blocks Failing Blocks Processed
  ---------- -------------- ----------------
  Data       0              18              
  Index      0              0              
  Other      0              133            

File Status Marked Corrupt Empty Blocks Blocks Examined High SCN
---- ------ -------------- ------------ --------------- ----------
7    OK     0              37402        393216          1900091  
  File Name: /data/oracle/data/O11/test_lob.dbf
  Block Type Blocks Failing Blocks Processed
  ---------- -------------- ----------------
  Data       0              0              
  Index      0              95              
  Other      0              355719          

channel ORA_DISK_1: starting validation of datafile
channel ORA_DISK_1: specifying datafile(s) for validation
including current control file for validation
including current SPFILE in backup set
channel ORA_DISK_1: validation complete, elapsed time: 00:00:01
List of Control File and SPFILE
===============================
File Type    Status Blocks Failing Blocks Examined
------------ ------ -------------- ---------------
SPFILE       OK     0              2              
Control File OK     0              600            
Finished validate at 2012-08-17 10:46:55

RMAN>

--
Mladen Gogala
http://mgogala.freehostia.com


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Noons  
View profile  
 More options Aug 18 2012, 7:57 am
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server
From: Noons <wizofo...@yahoo.com.au>
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 21:57:44 +1000
Local: Sat, Aug 18 2012 7:57 am
Subject: Re: bLOCKRECOVER in 11G?
Mladen Gogala wrote,on my timestamp of 18/08/2012 1:00 AM:

> I've had some brief corruption caused by sunspots (actually, it was a
> proof of concept DR test, the corrupt blocks were caused by NOLOGGING
> operations) and I decided to repair blocks by using BLOCKRECOVER
> CORRUPTION LIST. The database version is 11.2. Everything worked as
> planned. I then went to check the RMAN manual for 11G and BLOCKRECOVER
> command is no longer there, it is replaced by the new options to RECOVER
> commands. However, BLOCKRECOVER still works as a charm.

Yeah, quite a few diffs.  We need to add these to our local SydneyOracleMeetup
prezzie on rman.  I got a feeling 11gr2 is going to become a lot more relevant
over here.

> So does "BACKUP
> VALIDATE" which was superseded by the VALIDATE command. Oh well, the old
> dog is learning the new terminology for the old tricks. VALIDATE command
> in 11G produces a beautiful report:

Definitely going to be handy. Thanks!

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Mladen Gogala  
View profile  
 More options Aug 18 2012, 1:12 pm
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server
From: Mladen Gogala <gogala.mla...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 17:12:21 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Sat, Aug 18 2012 1:12 pm
Subject: Re: bLOCKRECOVER in 11G?

On Sat, 18 Aug 2012 21:57:44 +1000, Noons wrote:
> Yeah, quite a few diffs.  We need to add these to our local
> SydneyOracleMeetup prezzie on rman.  I got a feeling 11gr2 is going to
> become a lot more relevant over here.

Everything would be so much easier if only DBA 1.0 guys like me would
stop reading manuals.

--
Mladen Gogala
http://mgogala.freehostia.com


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
John Hurley  
View profile  
 More options Aug 18 2012, 8:34 pm
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server
From: John Hurley <johnthehur...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 17:34:25 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, Aug 18 2012 8:34 pm
Subject: Re: bLOCKRECOVER in 11G?
Mladen:

# The database version is 11.2.

AFAIK validate database came out in 11.1 ... as long as the "old
commands" work like they used to not a huge fan of minor syntax
changes ( enhancements ) when they work exactly the same as the old
ones.

I guess this one might be a minor exception since it is more clear to
people who do not really know the old command does not really backup
the database that this is only "checking things" ...


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Mladen Gogala  
View profile  
 More options Aug 19 2012, 1:12 am
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server
From: Mladen Gogala <gogala.mla...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 05:12:03 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Sun, Aug 19 2012 1:12 am
Subject: Re: bLOCKRECOVER in 11G?

On Sat, 18 Aug 2012 17:34:25 -0700, John Hurley wrote:
> AFAIK validate database came out in 11.1 ..

I have never used 11.1 in production or on a serious development machine
so I have never had a need to back it up. 11.2 is here to stay, at least
for a while: http://tinyurl.com/9uh2kde
My guess is that 11.2.0.4 will probably be unleashed onto the world in
late September/early October, just like the previous patch version. That
will be the terminal version that will get PSU patches every 3 months and
will remain the most pervasive version at least until 2015 when companies
will start launching the exploratory phase of the upgrade projects again.
The old wisdom of upgrading to the terminal version still applies. That's
what happened to 11.1, that's what will happen to 12c.
Essentially, 12.0 will be for the serious geeks like you and me, to
install on their home desktops. 12.1 will be for adventurers and for the
first exploration projects. 12.2.0.2 will start the "upgrade madness". I
don't expect to see it before 2015.
11G was a serious rewrite. A lot of things were changed: latches, ASM,
RAC, Oracle*Net, SGA handling, caching, SQL baselines, a lot of really
ground breaking stuff. True to the old lore, the versions with the even
numbers are stable versions which are just an improvement over the
previous version, the one with the odd number, like 11. I expect to see
some stability, but not in the early versions.

--
Mladen Gogala
http://mgogala.freehostia.com


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Noons  
View profile  
 More options Aug 19 2012, 6:25 am
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server
From: Noons <wizofo...@yahoo.com.au>
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 20:25:55 +1000
Local: Sun, Aug 19 2012 6:25 am
Subject: Re: bLOCKRECOVER in 11G?
Mladen Gogala wrote,on my timestamp of 19/08/2012 3:12 PM:

> Essentially, 12.0 will be for the serious geeks like you and me, to
> install on their home desktops. 12.1 will be for adventurers and for the
> first exploration projects. 12.2.0.2 will start the "upgrade madness". I
> don't expect to see it before 2015.

Agreed.  My next upgrade cycle is going to be around that date, so I'm hoping by
then 11.2.0.3 will be out - I don't trust the even-ended releases of Oracle...  ;-)

> ground breaking stuff. True to the old lore, the versions with the even
> numbers are stable versions which are just an improvement over the
> previous version, the one with the odd number, like 11. I expect to see
> some stability, but not in the early versions.

Oh goody! That means 12c will be the end of the line for me!
Plenty of time, then.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
John Hurley  
View profile  
 More options Aug 19 2012, 8:39 pm
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server
From: John Hurley <johnthehur...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 17:39:06 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Aug 19 2012 8:39 pm
Subject: Re: bLOCKRECOVER in 11G?
Mladen:

# My guess is that 11.2.0.4 will probably be unleashed onto the world
in late September/early October, just like the previous patch version.

Sounds early to me but hard to guess ... I was at an 11.2 upgrade
seminar last thurday ( from Oracle ).  Only 470 pages of relevant
information in the guide ??

https://blogs.oracle.com/upgrade/ … on right hand side ( down a bit )
is download links .. like for the 450 page slides …

Based on "publicly available info" ... and the party line from Oracle
presenter at this meeting ... expect 11.2.0.4 in early 2013 not this
year.

Unless you have sources that are more confident on an earlier date ...
nudge nudge ...


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Noons  
View profile  
 More options Aug 19 2012, 8:58 pm
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server
From: Noons <wizofo...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 17:58:04 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Aug 19 2012 8:58 pm
Subject: Re: bLOCKRECOVER in 11G?
On Aug 19, 8:25 pm, Noons <wizofo...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:

> Agreed.  My next upgrade cycle is going to be around that date, so I'm hoping by
> then 11.2.0.3 will be out - I don't trust the even-ended releases of Oracle...  ;-)

... and of course I meant 12.2.0.3...

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
joel garry  
View profile  
 More options Aug 20 2012, 11:47 am
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server
From: joel garry <joel-ga...@home.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 08:47:33 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, Aug 20 2012 11:47 am
Subject: Re: bLOCKRECOVER in 11G?
On Aug 19, 5:58 pm, Noons <wizofo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Aug 19, 8:25 pm, Noons <wizofo...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:

> > Agreed.  My next upgrade cycle is going to be around that date, so I'm hoping by
> > then 11.2.0.3 will be out - I don't trust the even-ended releases of Oracle...  ;-)

> ... and of course I meant 12.2.0.3...

Sunspots.

jg
--
@home.com is bogus.
http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/todd_akin_women_cant_get_...


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Mladen Gogala  
View profile  
 More options Aug 21 2012, 2:11 am
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server
From: Mladen Gogala <gogala.mla...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 06:11:32 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Tues, Aug 21 2012 2:11 am
Subject: Re: bLOCKRECOVER in 11G?

On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 08:47:33 -0700, joel garry wrote:
> On Aug 19, 5:58 pm, Noons <wizofo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Aug 19, 8:25 pm, Noons <wizofo...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:

>> > Agreed.  My next upgrade cycle is going to be around that date, so
>> > I'm hoping by then 11.2.0.3 will be out - I don't trust the
>> > even-ended releases of Oracle...  ;-)

>> ... and of course I meant 12.2.0.3...

> Sunspots.

> jg

Where is BDBAFH when people need him?

--
Mladen Gogala
http://mgogala.freehostia.com


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
John Hurley  
View profile  
 More options Aug 21 2012, 9:25 pm
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server
From: John Hurley <johnthehur...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 18:25:14 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Aug 21 2012 9:25 pm
Subject: Re: bLOCKRECOVER in 11G?
Mladen:

# True to the old lore, the versions with the even numbers are stable
versions which are just an improvement over the previous version, the
one with the odd number, like 11. I expect to see some stability, but
not in the early versions.

Lost me completely ... please explain some more.

8 was buggy as hell for a long time ... first stuff out in 10 was
pretty ugly.

For us 11.1 was pretty darn bullet proof ...


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
zigzag...@yahoo.com  
View profile  
 More options Aug 23 2012, 12:10 am
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server
From: zigzag...@yahoo.com
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 21:10:38 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, Aug 23 2012 12:10 am
Subject: Re: bLOCKRECOVER in 11G?

I have also been using 11.1.0.7.1 for a while which is very stable.
 One thing however never worked was baselines or something like where Oracle will change query plan only when it  guarentees that there will be 3 times improvement in performance.. I found that sysaux tablespace kept increasing and I had to disbale this feature. I hope it has been fixed in 11.2. but the place where I work, I will bot be able to upgrade to 11.2 until 2015...

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »