Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
will u chat with me.....
16 views
Skip to first unread message
divyas...@gmail.com
Apr 10, 2012, 1:40:24 AM4/10/12
to
if u want to do sexy chat with me. click here http://bigchurch.com/go/g1349457 and register it …I will be there..and join with me……
Mladen Gogala
Apr 10, 2012, 8:06:33 AM4/10/12
to
pins and mutexes instead of latches in version 11G or the implications of
private redo threads in Oracle 10G. That should be enough to put you in
the right mood.
--
http://mgogala.byethost5.com
Mladen Gogala
Apr 10, 2012, 8:10:13 AM4/10/12
to
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:06:33 +0000, Mladen Gogala wrote:
> Sure. We can talk RMAN, ASM, RAC, DBMS stats and optimizer, SQL tuning,
> pins and mutexes instead of latches in version 11G or the implications
> of private redo threads in Oracle 10G. That should be enough to put you
> in the right mood.
BTW, for those who have missed it, there was another revelation by Scott
> Sure. We can talk RMAN, ASM, RAC, DBMS stats and optimizer, SQL tuning,
> pins and mutexes instead of latches in version 11G or the implications
> of private redo threads in Oracle 10G. That should be enough to put you
> in the right mood.
Adams: http://www.dilbert.com/2012-04-08/
The term is "digisexual", more attracted to technology than people.
--
http://mgogala.byethost5.com
joel garry
Apr 10, 2012, 12:07:33 PM4/10/12
to
On Apr 10, 5:10 am, Mladen Gogala <gogala.mla...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:06:33 +0000, Mladen Gogala wrote:
> > Sure. We can talk RMAN, ASM, RAC, DBMS stats and optimizer, SQL tuning,
> > pins and mutexes instead of latches in version 11G or the implications
> > of private redo threads in Oracle 10G. That should be enough to put you
> > in the right mood.
Constraints...
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:06:33 +0000, Mladen Gogala wrote:
> > Sure. We can talk RMAN, ASM, RAC, DBMS stats and optimizer, SQL tuning,
> > pins and mutexes instead of latches in version 11G or the implications
> > of private redo threads in Oracle 10G. That should be enough to put you
> > in the right mood.
>
> BTW, for those who have missed it, there was another revelation by Scott
> Adams:http://www.dilbert.com/2012-04-08/
> The term is "digisexual", more attracted to technology than people.
>
> --http://mgogala.byethost5.com
jg
--
@home.com is bogus.
$ make love
Make: Don't know how to make love. Stop.
Mladen Gogala
Apr 10, 2012, 1:21:32 PM4/10/12
to
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:07:33 -0700, joel garry wrote:
> On Apr 10, 5:10 am, Mladen Gogala <gogala.mla...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:06:33 +0000, Mladen Gogala wrote:
>> > Sure. We can talk RMAN, ASM, RAC, DBMS stats and optimizer, SQL
>> > tuning,
>> > pins and mutexes instead of latches in version 11G or the
>> > implications of private redo threads in Oracle 10G. That should be
>> > enough to put you in the right mood.
>
> Constraints...
Yeah, that too.
> On Apr 10, 5:10 am, Mladen Gogala <gogala.mla...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:06:33 +0000, Mladen Gogala wrote:
>> > Sure. We can talk RMAN, ASM, RAC, DBMS stats and optimizer, SQL
>> > tuning,
>> > pins and mutexes instead of latches in version 11G or the
>> > implications of private redo threads in Oracle 10G. That should be
>> > enough to put you in the right mood.
>
> Constraints...
>
>
>> BTW, for those who have missed it, there was another revelation by
>> Scott Adams:http://www.dilbert.com/2012-04-08/
>> The term is "digisexual", more attracted to technology than people.
>>
>> --http://mgogala.byethost5.com
>
> Why did I picture Borat when I read the OP?
>
> jg
of Kazahstan, judging by the language. And, of course, this group is
probably the worst possible place for advertising "sexy chat" now that
dbaplusplus and zigzagdba are no longer partaking in the debates.
--
http://mgogala.byethost5.com
0 new messages