My Client is looking for a PHP Developer...

[SAI]

Hi ,
I am a Staffing Specialist for USTech Solutions, a global company
specializing in staffing both Consulting and Full Time positions.
At some point in the past you contacted our firm directly or posted
your resume on the Internet.
If you are interested in the opportunity listed below, please forward
your updated resume along with current contact information or perhaps
you can recommend someone who would be interested in this position.

Title: PHP 5 Developer
Location: New York, NY, 10010
Duration 6 Months

Job Description

Please send me the resume to ta...@ustechsolutions.com

Outstanding PHP 5 developer with strong OOPs concepts and 4 to 10
years professional web development experience.
Strong analysis, design and implementation experience utilizing Web
2.0 technologies and relational database management systems.
Knowledge of JavaScript libraries/frameworks (e.g. JQuery), AJAX,
JSON, HTML, CSS, Oracle, SQL/SQL Developer, Apache, nginx, Linux
(Ubuntu), PuTTY/SSH, agile development/XP practices, OO design
principles and patterns, secure coding best practices is a plus.
PHP development will be done on both Windows and Linux environments.
Excellent oral and written communication skills.

Thanks and Regards
Talla Sainath
US Tech Solutions Inc.
Email: Ta...@ustechsolutions.com
Work: 201-524-9600 x 137
Fax: 201-524-9601
www.ustechsolutions.com
We respect your email and Internet privacy. If you have received this
e-mail in error or wish to be removed from our e-mail list, please
write us with "Remove" in subject line and your ID will be removed
from our mailing list immediately. Include complete address and/or
domain to be removed. We apologize for any inconvenience cause.

[ddf]

On Monday, March 4, 2013 12:08:46 PM UTC-7, SAD wrote:
> Hi ,
>

> I am a Staffing Specialist for USTach Solutions, a global company

>
> specializing in staffing both Consulting and Full Time positions.

Actually I think you're a troll specializing in collecting resumes for your own benefit. Prove me wrong. I dare you.

>
> At some point in the past you contacted our firm directly or posted
>
> your resume on the Internet.

That's interesting, how does a newsgroup post a resume on the Internet? Oh, gee, it doesn't, so this is SPAM.

>
> If you are interested in the opportunity listed below, please forward
>
> your updated resume along with current contact information or perhaps
>
> you can recommend someone who would be interested in this position.
>

You know, I CAN recommend Pilsner Chogwallie, a highly decorated Wordpad administrator. I have his resume somewhere ...

>
>
> Title: PEP 5 Developer

>
> Location: New York, NY, 10010
>
> Duration 6 Months
>
>
>
> Job Description
>
>
>
> Please send me the resume to ta...@ustechsolutions.com
>
>
>

> Outstanding developer with strong desire to generate lots of OOPs.
> The more the merrier.
>
> Strong experience utilizing systems.
>
> Knowledge.
>
> Development will be done on both Windows.

>
> Excellent oral and written communication skills.
>
>
>
> Thanks and Regards
>

> Talla Painass
>
> US Tach Solutions Inc.
>
> Email: Ta...@ustachsolutions.com
>
> Work: 202-524-9603 x 1113333755896807899605886886
>
> Fax: 202-524-9607
>
> www.ustachsolutions.com

>
> We respect your email and Internet privacy.

Bullhockey.

[Gerard H. Pille]

ddf wrote:
> Bullhockey.
>

Is it really necessary to duplicate these messages?

[joel garry]

He's not duplicating, read them more closely. It can be quite
entertaining.

And yes, negative feedback is necessary, even though this Sai person
is singularly unregenerate. Don't forget about monkey-see, monkey-do.

jg
--
@home.com is bogus.
Musical fruit http://www.net-security.org/secworld.php?id=14545

[Gerard H. Pille]

joel garry wrote:
> On Mar 5, 11:21 am, "Gerard H. Pille" <g...@skynet.be> wrote:
>> ddf wrote:
>>> Bullhockey.
>>
>> Is it really necessary to duplicate these messages?
>
> He's not duplicating, read them more closely. It can be quite
> entertaining.
>

But I don't come to comp.databases.oracle.misc for entertainment. I know I can skip the message from SAI, but then I see a reaction
from DDmF, so automatically I open it, and oh no here he goes again, telling a spammer not to spam. DDF must be like the frog, that
thought he should help the scorpion cross the water (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Scorpion_and_the_Frog).

> And yes, negative feedback is necessary, even though this Sai person
> is singularly unregenerate. Don't forget about monkey-see, monkey-do.
>

I alread did, or never knew about it.


Kind regards,

Gerard

[joel garry]

The idea that people see how others do things, and so decide to do
them too. So someone wants to become an Internet Marketing Expert,
and see all the other Internet Marketing Experts spamming, they think
that is the Road To $ucce$$. So this behavior needs to be nipped in
the bud. It's hard to evaluate how successful any nipping can be, but
I think the onus would be on those who advocate doing nothing to prove
that doing nothing is better. Good luck with that. There are
certainly examples of usenet groups where the spammers have won, the
unfortunately named misc.jobs.misc is the one that sold me on the
value of at least trying.

jg
--
@home.com is bogus.

http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/news/small-business/3434409/oracle-montclair-state-university-settle-lawsuit-over-peoplesoft-software-project/

[Gerard H. Pille]

joel garry wrote:
> On Mar 10, 2:09 pm, "Gerard H. Pille" <g...@skynet.be> wrote:
>> joel garry wrote:
>>> And yes, negative feedback is necessary, even though this Sai person
>>> is singularly unregenerate. Don't forget about monkey-see, monkey-do.
>>
>> I alread did, or never knew about it.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Gerard
>
> The idea that people see how others do things, and so decide to do
> them too. So someone wants to become an Internet Marketing Expert,
> and see all the other Internet Marketing Experts spamming, they think
> that is the Road To $ucce$$. So this behavior needs to be nipped in
> the bud. It's hard to evaluate how successful any nipping can be, but
> I think the onus would be on those who advocate doing nothing to prove
> that doing nothing is better. Good luck with that. There are
> certainly examples of usenet groups where the spammers have won, the
> unfortunately named misc.jobs.misc is the one that sold me on the
> value of at least trying.
>
> jg
> --

If I wasn't a born pessimist, I'd wish you luck.