--
Albert D. Kallal
Edmonton, Alberta Canada
kal...@msn.com
"mlh, eit" <Shak...@Triad.rr.com> wrote in message
news:lq85eu09c02k8sdpq...@4ax.com...
On Wed, 15 May 2002 18:08:00 GMT, "mlh, eit" <Shak...@Triad.rr.com>
wrote:
--
Steve Jorgensen
Database application developer - available
http://www.coho.net/~jorgens
--
Access Hamsters: Free tools for users, DBAs, and developers.
http://users.starpower.net/rjhalljr Click on Downloads.
--
Larry Linson
http://www.ntpcug.org -- North Texas PC User Group
http://members.tripod.com/ntaccess -- Access SIG
http://members.tripod.com/accdevel -- Access Samples and Examples
>
And seven or so years from now you will still be repeating the Great Myths
of Access.
> And seven or so years from now you will
> still be repeating the Great Myths
> of Access.
You mean the one about Access 2007 being a solid, stable release and Access
2010 having unresolved issues, but Access 2012 holding promise?
Unless The Boys and Girls in Redmond change their direction, I expect that
seven years from now, Access may only be available in a subscription version
and I may well have lost interest entirely.
What are the pros and cons of upgrading? Or should I just stay with Access
2007 and wait until Access 2012 comes out?"
"Larry Linson" <larry....@ntpcug.org> wrote in message
news:uC_E8.9828$ek5....@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...
Peter
Peter
> Ooops!
> No can do: I've just realised the matter transmitter is running MS
EmbeddedOS v25.02 which detects non-current MS products and turns them into
pig food.
There are some who would say that is a miracle, that you can't reverse the
digestive process as you describe.
I'm sorry, but the one true Access is Access 2005. Everything else
is blasphamy. You should be ashamed.
Father Bob, S.C. (Society of Cheeses)