Your points lately have been very good.
Ian Michael Gumby wrote:
> I'm sure OTC beat me to the punch. (He's got a 6 hour head start when
> he see's El Reg ...)
> IBM just announced a new appliance. You can see the whole thing here:
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/11/11/lotus_server_appliance/
> "Late yesterday, IBM's Lotus collaboration software unit, one of the
> key pillars in the company's Software Group, lifted the veil a bit on
> its next-generation of Lotus Foundations Start appliances, which are
> set to ship in December."
> "Caleb Barlow, senior product manager for the Lotus Foundations
> appliance, isn't keen on giving away a lot of the details about what
> comprises the guts of the machine, but he says that the box is based
> on an x64 architecture and that it runs a very lean implementation of
> Linux based on Novell's SUSE Linux Enterprise Sever 10."
> Ok so far. But lets see what's bundled on the appliance....
> "...Barlow says that IBM and the Nitix experts it acquired did a lot
> of engineering work with SLES to streamline it and integrate the
> components that are used in the appliance, which includes a virtual
> private network, a firewall, a MySQL database server, a Web server
> (which one, IBM is not saying), and a print and file server. The mail
> server is Domino, and it is not stored inside that 100 MB DOM, but
> rather on the disk drives inside the appliance."
> Now before Serge gets his panties in a bind, yes, this is a Lotus
> product launch.
> Really its a collaboration between Lotus and IBM hardware.
> So here's the interesting question. What's wrong with this picture?
> I'd ask Ferris Buller, but like IBM SWG's senior management, he's out
> to lunch.
> Lets face it. Ambush isn't in sync with his counterparts. Now I'm not
> saying that they should have included IDS in the bundle, but they
> could have included SE or heck DB2 Express. MySQL was probably chosen
> because the appliance team still thinks in terms of LAMP.
> So one has to ask... since IBM is now shipping MySQL as part of the
> appliance... are they paying licensing fees to Sun? ;-)
> Clearly someone at IBM IM's top executive team is sleeping at the
> switch or someone needs to yank Sam's chain about the glass walls
> between the different divisions of SWG. Maybe Ambuj should put a call
> in to Alan G. for some help with cross pillar communication?
> TANSTAAFL!
> But hey! What do I know?
> -G