<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.ibm-db2</id>
  <title type="text">comp.databases.ibm-db2 Google Group</title>
  <subtitle type="text">
  Problem resolution with DB2 database products.
  </subtitle>
  <link href="/group/comp.databases.ibm-db2/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml" rel="self" title="comp.databases.ibm-db2 feed"/>
  <updated>2008-07-26T13:36:26Z</updated>
  <generator uri="http://groups.google.com" version="1.99">Google Groups</generator>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Serge Rielau</name>
  <email>srie...@ca.ibm.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-26T13:36:26Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.ibm-db2/browse_thread/thread/22fb12691b892159/d5a0e368c126978e?show_docid=d5a0e368c126978e</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.ibm-db2/browse_thread/thread/22fb12691b892159/d5a0e368c126978e?show_docid=d5a0e368c126978e"/>
  <title type="text">Re: MQT on a nickname</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Does the query itself work without the CREATE TABLE? &lt;br&gt; Let&#39;s first exclude federation (license, limitations)as a cultprit). &lt;br&gt; What does a db2set from your shell show? &lt;br&gt; Is FEDERATED turned on (I think its a DBM CFG). &lt;br&gt; Cheers &lt;br&gt; Serge
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Serge Rielau</name>
  <email>srie...@ca.ibm.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-26T12:15:01Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.ibm-db2/browse_thread/thread/a29de0a8e67ccbe4/c3e5a18a0ff010f7?show_docid=c3e5a18a0ff010f7</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.ibm-db2/browse_thread/thread/a29de0a8e67ccbe4/c3e5a18a0ff010f7?show_docid=c3e5a18a0ff010f7"/>
  <title type="text">Re: calling SP from UDF</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Exactly. The result set is a side-effect. You cannot pick it up past teh &lt;br&gt; SQL or within an SQL Function. The later is a restriction. Teh first by &lt;br&gt; design. &lt;br&gt; Cheers &lt;br&gt; Serge
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Frank Swarbrick</name>
  <email>frank.swarbr...@efirstbank.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-25T23:52:06Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.ibm-db2/browse_thread/thread/ae6d326d868a6d44/913413a667c56bc9?show_docid=913413a667c56bc9</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.ibm-db2/browse_thread/thread/ae6d326d868a6d44/913413a667c56bc9?show_docid=913413a667c56bc9"/>
  <title type="text">Re: SSL support for natvie DB2 LUW (non-SQLJ/JDBC)</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Thanks. &lt;br&gt; This actually led me to a page that seems even more useful: &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=71&amp;uid=swg21293566&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; This is the page for &amp;quot;DB2 Version 9.5 for Linux, UNIX and Windows APARs by &lt;br&gt; fix pack&amp;quot;. &lt;br&gt; Nice! &lt;br&gt; Frank
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>BD</name>
  <email>robert.d...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-25T21:37:29Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.ibm-db2/browse_thread/thread/3786aa4c180c8bc3/364f524a3ee79083?show_docid=364f524a3ee79083</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.ibm-db2/browse_thread/thread/3786aa4c180c8bc3/364f524a3ee79083?show_docid=364f524a3ee79083"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Is there a &#39;non-mandatory&#39; relationship in DB2 8 for Z/OS?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  According to the documentation, yes, the z/OS variant has had that &lt;br&gt; since version 8. &lt;br&gt; It looks as if the &#39;Allow nulls&#39; option within the RI relationship in &lt;br&gt; ERwin isn&#39;t having any effect on the generated DDL. Looks like all &lt;br&gt; constraints are enforced by default. I&#39;m not 100% positive that this &lt;br&gt; particular dialog in the tool is supposed to have this particular
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Arun Srinivasan</name>
  <email>arunro...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-25T20:51:38Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.ibm-db2/browse_thread/thread/22fb12691b892159/c31b17c20556e642?show_docid=c31b17c20556e642</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.ibm-db2/browse_thread/thread/22fb12691b892159/c31b17c20556e642?show_docid=c31b17c20556e642"/>
  <title type="text">Re: MQT on a nickname</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  db2 =&amp;gt; create table elg.artelgf as (select * from elg.artelgf_l2) data &lt;br&gt; initially deferred refresh deferred &lt;br&gt; DB21034E The command was processed as an SQL statement because it was &lt;br&gt; not a &lt;br&gt; valid Command Line Processor command. During SQL processing it &lt;br&gt; returned: &lt;br&gt; SQL0142N The SQL statement is not supported.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Mark A</name>
  <email>nob...@nowhere.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-25T20:30:41Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.ibm-db2/browse_thread/thread/3786aa4c180c8bc3/5b733da11a87ad67?show_docid=5b733da11a87ad67</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.ibm-db2/browse_thread/thread/3786aa4c180c8bc3/5b733da11a87ad67?show_docid=5b733da11a87ad67"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Is there a &#39;non-mandatory&#39; relationship in DB2 8 for Z/OS?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I am not sure if DB2 for z/OS has implemented it yet, but DB2 for LUW has &lt;br&gt; foreign keys that can be defined as (or altered to) &amp;quot;not enforced&amp;quot;.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <email>bwmille...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-25T19:18:41Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.ibm-db2/browse_thread/thread/deff4f54053fa582/f6dc2e0a8e33cff0?show_docid=f6dc2e0a8e33cff0</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.ibm-db2/browse_thread/thread/deff4f54053fa582/f6dc2e0a8e33cff0?show_docid=f6dc2e0a8e33cff0"/>
  <title type="text">Re: perl dbi built on DB2 8.2 does not run on 9.1</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  This should be fixed after you bind these: &lt;br&gt; db2 CONNECT TO MYDB &lt;br&gt; db2 BIND $HOME/sqllib/b...@db2ubind.lst BLOCKING ALL GRANT PUBLIC &lt;br&gt; db2 BIND $HOME/sqllib/b...@db2cli.lst BLOCKING ALL GRANT PUBLIC &lt;br&gt; db2 BIND $HOME/sqllib/bnd/db2schema.bnd BLOCKING ALL GRANT PUBLIC &lt;br&gt; db2rbind MYDB all /l $HOME/MYDB.log
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Darin McBride</name>
  <email>dmcbr...@naboo.to.org.no.spam.for.me</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-25T18:28:31Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.ibm-db2/browse_thread/thread/ae6d326d868a6d44/edab310416cf1768?show_docid=edab310416cf1768</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.ibm-db2/browse_thread/thread/ae6d326d868a6d44/edab310416cf1768?show_docid=edab310416cf1768"/>
  <title type="text">Re: SSL support for natvie DB2 LUW (non-SQLJ/JDBC)</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www-933.ibm.com/eserver/support/fixes/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; Select &amp;quot;Information Management&amp;quot;, then &amp;quot;DB2&amp;quot;, then &amp;quot;9.5.*&amp;quot;, then your &lt;br&gt; platform, and hit continue. Then select &amp;quot;Recommended&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;continue&amp;quot; (this &lt;br&gt; selects the most current fix pack). Then select the group (there should &lt;br&gt; only be one, I think) - you should be able to just hit &amp;quot;select all&amp;quot;. Now
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>lenygold via DBMonster.com</name>
  <email>u41...@uwe</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-25T17:33:05Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.ibm-db2/browse_thread/thread/a29de0a8e67ccbe4/c50ef049546f8e02?show_docid=c50ef049546f8e02</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.ibm-db2/browse_thread/thread/a29de0a8e67ccbe4/c50ef049546f8e02?show_docid=c50ef049546f8e02"/>
  <title type="text">Re: calling SP from UDF</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Thank&#39;s Serge for promt reply. &lt;br&gt; Does it mean if have SP like this: &lt;br&gt; CALL TAB_SEL_ANYPAGE(&#39;QUERY_LOG&#39;,&#39;I NVOICE#&#39; ,12,2); &lt;br&gt; INVOICE# CREATE_DATE QUERY_ID &lt;br&gt; ----------- ----------- ---------- &lt;br&gt; 13 05/10/2008 ALL01 13 &lt;br&gt; 14 05/10/2008 ALL01 14 &lt;br&gt; 15 05/10/2008 ALL01 15 &lt;br&gt; 16 05/10/2008 ALL01 16
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>BD</name>
  <email>robert.d...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-25T17:18:35Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.ibm-db2/browse_thread/thread/3786aa4c180c8bc3/5c9139fb16b66373?show_docid=5c9139fb16b66373</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.ibm-db2/browse_thread/thread/3786aa4c180c8bc3/5c9139fb16b66373?show_docid=5c9139fb16b66373"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Is there a &#39;non-mandatory&#39; relationship in DB2 8 for Z/OS?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Thanks for the response. Puts me somewhat at ease to hear a &lt;br&gt; confirmation that I wasn&#39;t missing something fundamental. Thanks!!
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>jefftyzzer</name>
  <email>jefftyz...@sbcglobal.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-25T17:10:44Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.ibm-db2/browse_thread/thread/3786aa4c180c8bc3/73c10c98ca98b5ee?show_docid=73c10c98ca98b5ee</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.ibm-db2/browse_thread/thread/3786aa4c180c8bc3/73c10c98ca98b5ee?show_docid=73c10c98ca98b5ee"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Is there a &#39;non-mandatory&#39; relationship in DB2 8 for Z/OS?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  BD: &lt;br&gt; As far as I know--and I&#39;ve used ERwin since the early-to-mid 90&#39;s--the &lt;br&gt; optionality of a parent/child relationship can only be represented in &lt;br&gt; the database by specifying whether or not the FK column is NULLable. &lt;br&gt; I&#39;m not aware of any facility in DB2 (or Oracle...or SQL Server...) to &lt;br&gt; express this concept otherwise. Also, I don&#39;t believe this is
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>shorti</name>
  <email>lbrya...@juno.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-25T16:50:24Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.ibm-db2/browse_thread/thread/ffb71ded102c649c/32f814321e387882?show_docid=32f814321e387882</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.ibm-db2/browse_thread/thread/ffb71ded102c649c/32f814321e387882?show_docid=32f814321e387882"/>
  <title type="text">Re: FETCH into sqlda structure</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Has anyone had any experience with this? I would appreciate any help &lt;br&gt; if you are using this technique.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>BD</name>
  <email>robert.d...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-25T16:25:24Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.ibm-db2/browse_thread/thread/3786aa4c180c8bc3/dc9d48b414928315?show_docid=dc9d48b414928315</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.ibm-db2/browse_thread/thread/3786aa4c180c8bc3/dc9d48b414928315?show_docid=dc9d48b414928315"/>
  <title type="text">Is there a &#39;non-mandatory&#39; relationship in DB2 8 for Z/OS?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I&#39;m working with a data model which is managed in the AllFusion ERwin &lt;br&gt; tool. &lt;br&gt; Within the modeler, some of the FK relationships are &#39;non-mandatory&#39; - &lt;br&gt; which is to say that for a given child value, a parent value is &lt;br&gt; optional. This is different from an optional child key, where the &lt;br&gt; child table allows null values - in this case it&#39;s the relation itself
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>J. Gleixner</name>
  <email>glex_no-s...@qwest-spam-no.invalid</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-25T15:40:44Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.ibm-db2/browse_thread/thread/deff4f54053fa582/e7496a10c57887e8?show_docid=e7496a10c57887e8</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.ibm-db2/browse_thread/thread/deff4f54053fa582/e7496a10c57887e8?show_docid=e7496a10c57887e8"/>
  <title type="text">Re: perl dbi built on DB2 8.2 does not run on 9.1</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I don&#39;t use DB2, however spending a couple of minutes searching &lt;br&gt; the Internet for that error seems to point to a db2stats.bnd &lt;br&gt; problem. &lt;br&gt; Cause &lt;br&gt; The db2stats.bnd package is not bound after fix pack installations. &lt;br&gt; And may sites list how to update it. &lt;br&gt; It probably wouldn&#39;t hurt to rebuild DBD with the new 9.1 libraries.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <email>dcrunch...@aim.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-25T14:47:49Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.ibm-db2/browse_thread/thread/deff4f54053fa582/686721dcfa0c66a2?show_docid=686721dcfa0c66a2</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.ibm-db2/browse_thread/thread/deff4f54053fa582/686721dcfa0c66a2?show_docid=686721dcfa0c66a2"/>
  <title type="text">perl dbi built on DB2 8.2 does not run on 9.1</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Our perl DBI is built on DB2 8.2. It runs fine on 8.2 &lt;br&gt; However it does not run on 9.1. After the connect to the database, at the first &lt;br&gt; SQL it gives this error &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;sql0818n A timestamp conflict occurred sqlstate 51003&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; Are we suppose to rebuild perl DBI for db2 in ver 9.1
  </summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
