We have a DR instance of our primary production database which is kept
in sync using log shipping and roll forward at the DR site. However,
our SLA permits us to run our production system under reduced capacity
in the event of a real DR. Having said that, we would ideally like to
reduce available memory at our DR site to half of what we have at our
primary (our primary database has 128 GB whereas we want to set our DR
instance to have 64 GB). Since we have STMM running on our primary
database, I wanted to confirm that this is indeed possible since STMM
does not log any memory related changes and so these changes would not
propagate over to the DR. Our database instance is on UDB 9.5 FP4 on
AIX 5.3 TL9 SP1.
Thanks,
SA
It does for HADR, so this probably applies for you as well.
Perhaps you c
But still, I can't see how the roll forward could ignore the changes
applied to the db cfg or other pools that are in the logs.
Regards, Pierre..
On Dec 8, 10:07 am, Frederik Engelen <engelenfrede...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Perhaps you c- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Regards,
- Steve P.
--
Steve Pearson, DB2 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows, IBM Software Group
"Portland" Development Team, IBM Beaverton Lab, Beaverton, OR, USA