lcc-win32 C99 status?

[Keith Thompson]

How well does the latest release of lcc-win32 conform to the C99
standard? What features, if any, are missing?

Is there a web page listing the current status, similar to the one for
gcc at <http://gcc.gnu.org/c99status.html>?

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) ks...@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
San Diego Supercomputer Center <*> <http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst>
We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this.

[jacob navia]

Keith Thompson wrote:
> How well does the latest release of lcc-win32 conform to the C99
> standard? What features, if any, are missing?
>
> Is there a web page listing the current status, similar to the one for
> gcc at <http://gcc.gnu.org/c99status.html>?
>

No, there isn't a listing but I am implementing as time
permits.

Designated initializers and structure initializers with the
dot notation are missing.

I am giving priority to the library, that is kind of
"mostly" finished. I have probably some problems with
complex numbers, there hasn't been a good testing of that
part.

Besides the preprocessor is still missing the variable
arguments feature.

jacob