Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Macro's For Basic Drilling Functionality?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Joe788

unread,
Dec 29, 2009, 6:44:38 PM12/29/09
to
I don't think so!

The only person who would waste time adding basic functionality to
what is suppose to be the worlds most successful CAM product
(Mastercam) would be the same loser who used Mastercam for years and
was so fucking stupid he couldn't find Ramping under Lead-In / Lead-
Out. Folks it doesn't get any more basic than that!

Why not demand that your CADCAM system be able to do drilling like
SolidCAM or Cimatron can:

http://jonbanquer.wordpress.com/how-drill-recognition-should-be-done-solidcam-gets-it-right/

Cliff

unread,
Dec 30, 2009, 3:35:10 AM12/30/09
to
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 15:44:38 -0800 (PST), Joe788 <larry...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> the same loser who used Mastercam for years and
>was so fucking stupid he couldn't find Ramping under Lead-In / Lead-
>Out. Folks it doesn't get any more basic than that!

Stupid:
(larry...@yahoo.com AKA Larry the Loser is yonnie bunko)

http://www.mastercamforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=10

.187 is NOT the same as .1875 or .1865 or .1873!!
And when you have two differently sized holes selecting
a large one with a + selection tolerance will not find the
smaller ones. But if you select a smaller one it may find the larger
ones.
Naturally these may be selected as multiple sets ...
http://www.mastercamforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=14

"Mask on arc" works just fine for the non-clueless.
And nobody that does not know simple things such as
1875 > 1873 has any business pretending to be a programmer
of any sort.

The guys with the nets are after him & all the many little
gibbering voices in his pointed little head.

On a brighter note they qualify for a group discount at the
funny farm.
--
Cliff

0 new messages