MitchAlsup wrote:Is it even possible to have good performance with a TLB which is too
> We found that as you scale back the computation power (i.e.
> complexity) ofthe core, you can dramatically scale back to size of
> the TLB. So you might need a 64-entry FA TLB backed up by a 512-entry
> 4-way set TLB for a great big OoO core; you can get away with a
> 32-entry FA TLB fro a core of 1/2 to compute power of its GBOoO
> Other smaller earlier cores point to a serious disadvantage if/when
small to cover the cache hierarchy?
I.e. I remember fondly (NOT!) the Pentium model that had 512 KB L2 cache
We got very distinct performance knees when the working set passed the
Can you reload TLB entries fast enough (from cache?) that this problem
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.