Newsgroups: comp.arch
From: bro...@vette.llnl.gov (Eugene Brooks)
Date: 15 Oct 89 18:20:48 GMT
Local: Sun, Oct 15 1989 2:20 pm
Subject: Re: ATTACK OF KILLER MICROS
In article <1...@m3.mfci.UUCP> colw...@mfci.UUCP (Robert Colwell) writes: Microprocessor development is not ignoring vectorizable workloads. The >So while it's ok to chortle at how the micros have caught up on the scalar >stuff, I think it would be an unwarranted extrapolation to imply that the >supers have been superseded unless you also specify the workload. latest have fully pipeline floating point and are capable of pipelining several memory accesses. As I noted, interleaving directly on the memory chip is trivial and memory chip makers will do it soon. Micros now dominate the performance game for scalar code and are moving on to vectorizable code. After all, these little critters mutate and become more voracious every 6 months and vectorizable code is the only thing left for them to conquer. No NEW technology needs to be developed, all the micro-chip and memory-chip makers need to do is to decide to take over the supercomputer market. They will do this with their commodity parts. Supercomputers of the future will be scalable multiprocessors made of many NOTHING WILL WITHSTAND THE ATTACK OF THE KILLER MICROS! You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||