Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
comp.arch
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion Beyond multicore
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Nick Maclaren  
View profile  
 More options Mar 23 2007, 11:29 am
Newsgroups: comp.arch
From: n...@cus.cam.ac.uk (Nick Maclaren)
Date: 23 Mar 2007 15:29:43 GMT
Local: Fri, Mar 23 2007 11:29 am
Subject: Re: Beyond multicore
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

In article <1174663055.047558.50...@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,

"Robert Myers" <rbmyers...@gmail.com> writes:

|>
|> I thought the 80-core model displayed by Intel already resembled Blue
|> Gene: each core had it's own router chip.  Not nearly as much memory
|> per processor, of course, and I'd be curious to know about the
|> bisection bandwidth of the chip (one track mind).

Intel have stated repeatedly and publicly that their current chip is
merely a hardware engineer's testbed.  It would be very foolish to
read anything into its exact specification.

Regards,
Nick Maclaren.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google