there's a little more to it than that jorn... mostly i'm just sick of you
spouting your highly uninformed opinion all over the net. But i'd like to
set the record straight about the non-disclosure thing. what follows are
jorn's emails to me about this subject... (** indicates a comment i have
just now added)
i'm the quoted speaker, jorn is plain (unless otherewise noted)
** this is jorn's response to a posting i made to of of his famous 'stop
stealing my idea's' postings.
Date: Tue, 30 May 95 06:59 CDT
From: j...@mcs.com (Jorn Barger)
To: cmc...@mbnet.mb.ca
Subject: Re: The Naive Witness and the Human Sciences
Newsgroups: comp.ai,sci.cognitive
References: <3pnr4b$scp@Mars.mcs.com> <3q84ai$qe8@apollo.it.luc.edu>
<3q8e0g$...@Venus.mcs.com> <3qdbrt$...@movietone.ils.nwu.edu>
<3qdg1l$...@Mars.mcs.com>
Organization: The Responsible Party
Cc:
In article <3qe9qh$...@canopus.cc.umanitoba.ca> you write:
>geez jorn, is the whole world trying to steal your mind??
this sounds rather derogatory.
>hope you don't think i'm trying to do the same... the email i sent you
>regarding the similarities between some stuff on your homepage and my
>Loebner entry Jackie are predated by 11 years of well documented work on
>ai and index theory... nothing published, but tons of email.
can you correctly summarize my fractal thicket approach? (bet you
can't...)
i think you ought to have emailed these comments rather than posting
them.
j
Subject: Re: The Naive Witness and the Human Sciences
To: Christopher_McKins...@MBnet.MB.CA (Christopher McKinstry)
Date: Tue, 30 May 1995 21:10:47 -0500 (CDT)
From: "Jorn Barger" <j...@mcs.com>
Content-Length: 738
> 2) i can do better than summarize it... i can show you a working program
> that uses similar (although better) technology that has been working and
> accumulating data since 1985 (as soon as you agree to sign the
> non-disclosure i asked you to sign a number of months ago).... where's you
> software??
** here's where things start to turn bad...
you know, my respect for you, which has always been marginal, is now
about negative infinity.
i told you very plainly that i cannot sign such a non-disclosure.
you said you'd be putting jackie on the net, anyway... right?
and if you understand fractal thicket theory, you ought to be able
to summarize its essence in a sentence... right?
you write like a teenager, and have shown frequent signs of
extreme cluelessness...
j
** here's my response to jorn (jorn in quotes, me plain) - no header
because i yanked it out of my outbox.
>you know, my respect for you, which has always been marginal, is now
>about negative infinity.
it's nice to know that you come out of the box with marginal respect for
people you don't know... somehow i'm not suprised.
>i told you very plainly that i cannot sign such a non-disclosure.
>you said you'd be putting jackie on the net, anyway... right?
>and if you understand fractal thicket theory, you ought to be able
>to summarize its essence in a sentence... right?
>you write like a teenager, and have shown frequent signs of
>extreme cluelessness...
BTW: jorn, you are quite notorious (as you so often profess)... i'd love
to send you copies of the stuff i've been getting the past two days about
your notorious mental instability... but alas i don't want you to loose
it and kill anyone as some have predicted... anyway i'm sure you know
what the people you have worked with think of you.
the list of people who think you are an unemployable, unstable flake has
grown by one.
chris.
** to which mr. crybaby responds:
Subject: Hatemail from one of your users
To: Christopher_McKins...@mbnet.mb.ca (Christopher McKinstry)
Date: Wed, 31 May 1995 12:59:55 -0500 (CDT)
From: "Jorn Barger" <j...@mcs.com>
Cc: postmas...@mbnet.mb.ca
Content-Length: 181
Postmaster-
I've been getting extremely hateful email from one of your users,
Christopher_McKins...@MBnet.MB.CA (Christopher McKinstry)
and would like it to stop.
j
jorn barger
--
K. Christopher McKinstry http://www.mbnet.mb.ca/~cmckin/
======================================================================
-The Truth is of course, is the Universe is playing God with dice...
-Intelligence is to genespace as vision is to 3space
-The Universe is a single point in 6N space.
|
