Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!uni-erlangen.de!news.uni-erlangen.de!not-for-mail From: Jochen Schmidt Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy,comp.lang.java.programmer,comp.lang.lisp,alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: lisp Followup-To: comp.ai.philosophy Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 19:00:44 +0100 Organization: Dataheaven Lines: 14 Message-ID: <9v82fq$t2t$1@rznews2.rrze.uni-erlangen.de> References: <9v635g$ojj$1@news8.svr.pol.co.uk> <3c176fb2@news.victoria.tc.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: enterprice.st-peter.stw.uni-erlangen.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Trace: rznews2.rrze.uni-erlangen.de 1008176442 29789 131.188.24.131 (12 Dec 2001 17:00:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@uni-erlangen.de NNTP-Posting-Date: 12 Dec 2001 17:00:42 GMT User-Agent: KNode/0.6 Martin Cote wrote: > I have been using Scheme (a LISP dialect) for about a year now, so yes, > many > people still use LISP. In fact, many companies such as Oracle or AMD have > Scheme licenses to controle a few of their modules where C++ or Java > doesn't give good performances. > > And yes, Prolog and LISP are widely used in AI. Minor sidenote: We tend to call it "Lisp" and not "LISP" this days... ciao, Jochen