Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

...and Film Making is ..like!

0 views
Skip to first unread message

N

unread,
Dec 25, 2009, 7:57:57 PM12/25/09
to
Ramzi Binalshibh & Gary Mckinnon


and the only two coincidences between the two might be the 9/11 attack

can I believe or rely on the computer and data biased research and
forensics to disprove either are wholly guilty of either offence they
are publicised as the cause of?

this post is neither to dissuade or in support that a reader to assume
that there is a proof of either man would have been committing any
offence, purely that in UK if a man is publicised as already having
committed anyt offence he may be aquitted in that such publicity may
be the cause of a the court a hearing rt to decide them guilty or not
prior to a full private hearing.

In UK a man is innocent until he is proven guilty, unlike other courts
in the world.

and how much is data and computing used in forensics to prove a person
guilty of any offence prior to any wrongdoings

N

unread,
Dec 25, 2009, 8:44:57 PM12/25/09
to

The Ramsey I knew of got married to a very polite attractive lady and
settled down & married, he was a great artist..at the time (ditto!)
and very personable albeit nosey LOL...and what if Mckinnon was a
graphics artist? and was experimenting with the commercial programmes
he has legally bought? or if an auctioneer? and he was researching for
potentially new markets for what was for sale via his own business

0 new messages