From: Tom Trenka <ttre...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 13:10:40 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, May 17 2011 4:10 pm
Subject: Re: Split off AMD? (was Re: [CommonJS] New amd-implement list)
I am a long-time lurker and not a commentator, so take this as you
will. That being said: > I see AMD as a subset of CommonJS. I do not need to load individual
*You* may not need to load individual modules because you are focused
> modules into the browser as my primary criteria. on the server, but that happens to be the primary use and need at the moment (i.e. within a client). I can entirely appreciate JS-on-the- server (that is where I learned JS primarily) but at the same time you can't just ignore the primary usage in favor of your own efforts, efforts with Node (/me golf claps) notwithstanding. I would almost (not quite, but almost) suggest that if you are going
The point of creating the AMD list is to remove the noise from this
Regards--
PS. Christoph: my apologies, I am not targeting you personally. I've
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||