                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of nrst...@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.46 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.160.46;
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=q7e5IJooDkJ353QPl1nfVabCwKBZn57L+iETHMJO5GITUANkUxtHdcaa750+obiFps
         dcX2yDxSgsOzpyrKkQqw698IlH3z35SnuY7fcJMWBT+qjUIQUC+ko+mv74XMDD+V39PM
         ri0ZCCRedLrmc1cu4GDBBmshRoEFisclRQtsI=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimKaDUcNJSboZrJp2Yx+K2acLE...@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTinfM6HOVAUbsDOi=ntTm66UR1J...@mail.gmail.com>
	<8d462e98-efa7-49fa-9561-8de6826d1...@z19g2000yqz.googlegroups.com>
	<BANLkTimmw4UaCrTU4xY4kc8x1Fo1NFY...@mail.gmail.com>
	<4DD2F0B3.5040...@gmail.com>
	<BANLkTimwW_HAg6BhOcc_9yg8mEZfE9c...@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTimKaDUcNJSboZrJp2Yx+K2acLE...@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 21:09:20 -0500
Message-ID: <BANLkTinyOp0vT8rmTOf3Q4X8W_CGD8w...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Split off AMD? (was Re: [CommonJS] New amd-implement list)
From: Nathan Stott <nrst...@gmail.com>
To: commonjs@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

For what it's worth I'm -1 on the split.  It's not as though this list
is overburdened with traffic and the projects are geared at a similar
/ overlapping audience.

On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Wes Garland <w...@page.ca> wrote:
> On 17 May 2011 18:59, James Burke <jrbu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I am hoping to hear from the rest of the CommonJS founders, but it
>> does seem like it is best to split out AMD from the CommonJS
>> list/wiki.
>
> I think we should at the very least have links from CommonJS -> AMD.=A0 T=
he
> two projects are closely aligned in goals, even if they are not completel=
y
> interoperable. It is more healthy to have a well-documented inclusive
> ecosystem than it is to have either poorly-labelled projects or to preten=
d
> other work does not exist.
>
> I echo your sentiments re. Mikeal's post, relevancy is another thread for
> another day.
>
> Wes
>
> --
> Wesley W. Garland
> Director, Product Development
> PageMail, Inc.
> +1 613 542 2787 x 102
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "CommonJS" group.
> To post to this group, send email to commonjs@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> commonjs+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/commonjs?hl=3Den.
>