Wave

[Daniel Friesen]

I'm curious how many people on the CommonJS list participating in
discussions have Wave accounts?

Just curious since Wave is kind of an in-between between e-mails and irc
and in some cases might fit some of the less debate like discussions
which may be spread out more over time (rather than idling in #commonjs).

That... And my Wave account has pretty much been idling (I stopped
opening it up even since I need to manually click through the warning
that the preview doesn't support Prisim even though it's basically
Firefox) despite having two invites myself (one from someone at work,
and later an official invite from the form I filled out ages before) and
the collection of invites they hand out to you awhile after your account
is created.

--
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]

[Chris Zumbrunn]

I for one wouldn't mind using the CommonJS project as a guinea pig to
put my Wave account to some real use.

Chris

[Kiswono Prayogo]

+1 ^^
mine idling too..

--
Regards,
Kiswono P
GB

[Dean Landolt]

On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 7:37 AM, Kiswono Prayogo <kis...@gmail.com> wrote:

+1 ^^
mine idling too..

Heh -- same here.

Isn't this the same problem with every bit of tech that tries to supersede email?

[Daniel Friesen]

;) That, and it's also fault of limited people coming in, and not making
it easy to browse as a community.

I created a publicly available "CommonJS Central Wave" since there are
no CommonJS related waves on Wave, it's easiest if everyone would join it.
Actually it looks like a moderator to the group could probably add the
group itself to the wave. I have a feeling the only thing it'll really
do though is let anyone in the group find the wave buy clicking the
"Group Waves" button that shows up when you click on the group in the
contact list.

[Joe Developer]

Anyone can add  comm...@googlegroups.com to a wave, and what it means is that everyone who is a member of the group can discover and have access to the waves via searching for 'comm...@googlegroups.com', you don't have to give 'everyone' access, and you don't have to add individual members for each wave. Its a kind of simple access control. The discoverability aspect is probably the more important one. 

[Christoph Dorn]

Joe Developer wrote:
> Anyone can add comm...@googlegroups.com
> <mailto:comm...@googlegroups.com> to a wave, and what it means is that

> everyone who is a member of the group can discover and have access to
> the waves via searching for 'comm...@googlegroups.com

> <mailto:comm...@googlegroups.com>', you don't have to give 'everyone'

> access, and you don't have to add individual members for each wave. Its
> a kind of simple access control. The discoverability aspect is probably
> the more important one.

I am open to trying wave as well. Gozala and I have been using it for
narwhal-xulrunner and it has been working well so far.

Christoph