notice. Didn't phrase my original email very well, did I? But since
So consider my complaint withdrawn. I'll try to type better. :)
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Mark Mandel<mark.man
...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As far as I am aware, ColdSpring deviates in a few places from the spring
> DTD/Schema (most notable the 'name' attribute on contructor-args), so there
> is no actual checking against it on load up of ColdSpring, although I may
> have to look at the code to confirm that.
> I just added a Story to the tracker we've started using to make sure that
> for the next version we are validating against a Schema, to avoid these
> sorts of issues.
> Mark
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 3:16 AM, Barney Boisvert <bboisv...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> I just fat fingered (the 'l' in 'rel') some XML:
>> <property name="cacheStats"><rel bean="contentCacheStats" /></property>
>> ColdSpring happily loaded the XML and initialized the bean factory, it
>> just silently ignored that property. Obviously it's my fault for fat
>> fingering, but it seems like the XML consumer ought to notice this and
>> tell me I'm an idiot, right? It's valid XML, of course, but clearly
>> doesn't satisfy the DTD. On this particular project we're
>> intentionally using a slightly outdated version of ColdSpring, so
>> before I go digging in, does anyone know if this is still a problem
>> with HEAD?
>> cheers,
>> barenyb
>> --
>> Barney Boisvert
>> bboisv...@gmail.com
>> http://www.barneyb.com/
> --
> E: mark.man...@gmail.com
> W: www.compoundtheory.com
|
