Exception on Mapper.Class<T>(Property) - ConfORM

The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Message from discussion Exception on Mapper.Class<T>(Property)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jfromanie...@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.169 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.169;
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=fSpitAkC/ur5LR5nKo4PZHAbzagyQ9QEVzkok7DZmvufxRiCIssFv+0AGBqjqW5Szw
         2sd7fJSL3gi+IxAe8UK4ie81KAw97df6a9ejWUcXdL2SYNjLbG+wk72YHwOzptxj1Tz4
         JG1iDlDIVxpdVogjx6sURD8bQOuiGgjLW6hmI=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <f5168d55-2634-4a3e-a32d-aec907011...@j23g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
References: <a14b006b-d013-4363-9ed9-8520bb149...@r35g2000prj.googlegroups.com>
	<BANLkTinE0VPYQSkkKrYjk81zkC5E1PA...@mail.gmail.com>
	<e44a9115-80d0-48b1-a8ab-567f220cd...@28g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>
	<b9f0292b-c3a3-40ca-a23a-18d5697db...@d28g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>
	<cf781f1c-257d-4525-b6b0-4998f5d3a...@gv8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
	<6882a324-f7c7-4cc1-829e-830d8018c...@d19g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
	<BANLkTi==A8PpNYJQ6o40VkDdKwNBF78...@mail.gmail.com>
	<2b8975bb-25cd-4698-8691-7866659f0...@x6g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>
	<BANLkTikzo=RjuHU8KH+e8Yjpn2RNru+...@mail.gmail.com>
	<f5168d55-2634-4a3e-a32d-aec907011...@j23g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 17:47:17 -0300
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=Jtq=FFqzKgDTe0C_ULx_Wty6...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [ConfORM] Re: Exception on Mapper.Class<T>(Property)
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_F=2E_Romaniello?= <jfromanie...@gmail.com>
To: codeconform@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364c77ff4825d504a433ed61

--0016364c77ff4825d504a433ed61
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

In the current state of the art, i don't recommend you to build nothing on
top of EF.
OTOH; I don't see why something like that will be useful. Each ORM has their
own features for mapping... or at least EF has much less than NH, why you
would abstract the mapping thing?
With the current ORMs in .Net you can't map a four-class domain as-is in two
different ORMs.
This menas that if you want to change the orm you have to do major changes
in your entities...

2011/5/26 Matteo Migliore <matteo.migli...@gmail.com>

> Do you plan to make ConfOrm separated to NH for a part to allow to use
> it with EF also?
>

--0016364c77ff4825d504a433ed61
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

In the current state of the art, i don&#39;t recommend you to build nothing=
 on top of EF.<br>OTOH; I don&#39;t see why something like that will be use=
ful. Each ORM has their own features for mapping... or at least EF has much=
 less than NH, why you would abstract the mapping thing?<br>
With the current ORMs in .Net you can&#39;t map a four-class domain as-is i=
n two different ORMs. <br>This menas that if you want to change the orm you=
 have to do major changes in your entities...<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_qu=
ote">
2011/5/26 Matteo Migliore <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:matteo.mi=
gli...@gmail.com">matteo.migli...@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span><br><blockquote c=
lass=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;=
padding-left:1ex;">
<div id=3D":2jv">Do you plan to make ConfOrm separated to NH for a part to =
allow to use<br>
it with EF also?</div></blockquote></div><br>

--0016364c77ff4825d504a433ed61--
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
Account Options
