I'm wrapping ConfOrm to have the simplest code as possible to map an
entity.
I've this code on a "mapping class":
public class CustomerMapper : UniqueEntityMapping<Customer>
{
public CustomerMapper()
{
Property(p => p.FirstName, pm => { pm.Length(200);
pm.NotNullable(true); });
Property(p => p.LastName, pm => { pm.Length(250);
pm.NotNullable(true); });
}
}
I call this method in the base class of the "mapping class":
mapper.Class<TEntity>(c => c.Property(p => property.Key,
property.Value));
Where localProperty is a:
KeyValuePair<object, Action<IPropertyMapper>>.
I obtain this exception:
{"Value cannot be null.\r\nParameter name: localMember"}
StackTrace:
at ConfOrm.NH.PropertyPath..ctor(PropertyPath previousPath,
MemberInfo localMember)
at
ConfOrm.NH.CustomizersImpl.PropertyContainerCustomizer`1.Property[TProperty ]
(Expression`1 property, Action`1 mapping)
at
EyeOpen.Data.Nhibernate.ConformModelMapping.<>c__DisplayClass6`1.<Register> b__3(IClassMapper`1
c) in E:\Dropbox\Eye.World\Business\Eye.Soft.v2\Dev\Hyperion\Main\Op
\Core\Proj\Sdk\DataAccessSdk\Src\Data.IntegrationTest\Nhibernate
\Mapping\Class\ConformModelMapping.cs:line 72
at ConfOrm.NH.Mapper.Class[TRootEntity](Action`1 customizeAction)
at EyeOpen.Data.Nhibernate.ConformModelMapping.Register[TEntity]
(IEntityMapping`1 entityConfiguration) in E:\Dropbox\Eye.World\Business
\Eye.Soft.v2\Dev\Hyperion\Main\Op\Core\Proj\Sdk\DataAccessSdk\Src
\Data.IntegrationTest\Nhibernate\Mapping\Class
\ConformModelMapping.cs:line 72
at EyeOpen.Data.IntegrationTest.Nhibernate.FooModelMapping..ctor()
in E:\Dropbox\Eye.World\Business\Eye.Soft.v2\Dev\Hyperion\Main\Op\Core
\Proj\Sdk\DataAccessSdk\Src\Data.IntegrationTest\Nhibernate
\FooModelMapping.cs:line 9
at
EyeOpen.Data.IntegrationTest.Nhibernate.NhibernateRepositoryTest.ClassIniti alize(TestContext
testContext) in E:\Dropbox\Eye.World\Business\Eye.Soft.v2\Dev\Hyperion
\Main\Op\Core\Proj\Sdk\DataAccessSdk\Src\Data.IntegrationTest
\NhibernateRepositoryTest.cs:line 27
The exception is clear. What is not clear is UniqueEntityMapping<T> btw you are wrongly creating an instance of PropertyPath passing a null as localMember
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Matteo Migliore <matteo.migli...@gmail.com>wrote:
On May 26, 12:21 am, Fabio Maulo <fabioma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The exception is clear.
Yes, it is :).
But I don't understand how to solve it.
> What is not clear is UniqueEntityMapping<T>
> btw you are wrongly creating an instance of PropertyPath passing a null as
> localMember
I can publish the latest version of source code.
Btw the base class of UniqueEntityMapping<T> is:
public abstract class EntityMapping<TEntity> :
IEntityMapping<TEntity>
where TEntity : IUniqueEntity
{
private readonly IDictionary<object, Action<IPropertyMapper>>
properties =
new Dictionary<object, Action<IPropertyMapper>>();
private readonly IDictionary<object, FluentPropertyMapper>
properties2 =
new Dictionary<object, FluentPropertyMapper>();
public IEnumerable<KeyValuePair<object, Action<IPropertyMapper>>>
Properties
{
get { return properties; }
}
public IEnumerable<KeyValuePair<object, FluentPropertyMapper>>
Properties2
{
get { return properties2; }
}
public Action<IIdMapper> IdMapper
{
get; private set;
}
public virtual MappingStrategies Strategy
{
get { return MappingStrategies.TablePerClass; }
}
public void Id(Action<IIdMapper> idMapper)
{
IdMapper = idMapper;
}
public FluentPropertyMapper
FluentProperty<TProperty>(Expression<Func<TEntity, TProperty>>
property)
{
var propertyMember =
typeof(TEntity)
.GetProperty(ExpressionHelper<TEntity>.GetPropertyName(property),
BindingFlags.Instance | BindingFlags.Public);
var fluentPropertyMapper = new FluentPropertyMapper(propertyMember,
new NHibernate.Cfg.MappingSchema.HbmProperty());
The problem could be in the first line of method Property of the class
PropertyContainerCustomizer<TEntity>:
MemberInfo localMember =
TypeExtensions.DecodeMemberAccessExpression<TEntity,
TProperty>(property);
But I checked, TypeExtensions works well.
Uhm...
On May 26, 12:26 am, Matteo Migliore <matteo.migli...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On May 26, 12:21 am, Fabio Maulo <fabioma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > The exception is clear.
> Yes, it is :).
> But I don't understand how to solve it.
> > What is not clear is UniqueEntityMapping<T>
> > btw you are wrongly creating an instance of PropertyPath passing a null as
> > localMember
> I can publish the latest version of source code.
> Btw the base class of UniqueEntityMapping<T> is:
> public abstract class EntityMapping<TEntity> :
> IEntityMapping<TEntity>
> where TEntity : IUniqueEntity
> {
> private readonly IDictionary<object, Action<IPropertyMapper>>
> properties =
> new Dictionary<object, Action<IPropertyMapper>>();
> > > I call this method in the base class of the "mapping class":
> > > mapper.Class<TEntity>(c => c.Property(p => property.Key,
> > > property.Value));
> > > Where localProperty is a:
> > > KeyValuePair<object, Action<IPropertyMapper>>.
> > > I obtain this exception:
> > > {"Value cannot be null.\r\nParameter name: localMember"}
> > > StackTrace:
> > > at ConfOrm.NH.PropertyPath..ctor(PropertyPath previousPath,
> > > MemberInfo localMember)
> > > at
To test the code you have to go to EyeOpen.Data.IntegrationTest
project,
remove the comment ////INhibernateMapping mapping = new
FooModelMapping();
to use the FooModelMapping class and run the tests.
Thx!
On May 26, 12:34 am, Matteo Migliore <matteo.migli...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> The problem could be in the first line of method Property of the class
> PropertyContainerCustomizer<TEntity>:
> MemberInfo localMember =
> TypeExtensions.DecodeMemberAccessExpression<TEntity,
> TProperty>(property);
> But I checked, TypeExtensions works well.
> Uhm...
> On May 26, 12:26 am, Matteo Migliore <matteo.migli...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On May 26, 12:21 am, Fabio Maulo <fabioma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > The exception is clear.
> > Yes, it is :).
> > But I don't understand how to solve it.
> > > What is not clear is UniqueEntityMapping<T>
> > > btw you are wrongly creating an instance of PropertyPath passing a null as
> > > localMember
> > I can publish the latest version of source code.
> > Btw the base class of UniqueEntityMapping<T> is:
> > public abstract class EntityMapping<TEntity> :
> > IEntityMapping<TEntity>
> > where TEntity : IUniqueEntity
> > {
> > private readonly IDictionary<object, Action<IPropertyMapper>>
> > properties =
> > new Dictionary<object, Action<IPropertyMapper>>();
> > > > I call this method in the base class of the "mapping class":
> > > > mapper.Class<TEntity>(c => c.Property(p => property.Key,
> > > > property.Value));
> > > > Where localProperty is a:
> > > > KeyValuePair<object, Action<IPropertyMapper>>.
> > > > I obtain this exception:
> > > > {"Value cannot be null.\r\nParameter name: localMember"}
Now is possible to write this using ConfOrm:
var connection =
new NhibernateMicrosoftSqlServerConnection
{
DataSource = Connection.DataSource,
Catalog = string.Concat(Connection.Catalog),
IsTrustedConnection = Connection.IsTrustedConnection
};
INhibernateMapping mapping = new FooModelMapping();
////INhibernateMapping mapping = new FooFlatModelMapping();
configuration =
new NhibernateConfigurationBuilder()
.ProxyFactory<NHibernate.ByteCode.Castle.ProxyFactoryFactory>()
.Build(connection, mapping.GetMapping());
And the mapping:
public class CustomerMapper : UniqueEntityMapping<Customer>
{
public CustomerMapper()
{
Property(p => p.FirstName)
.Lenght(200)
.NotNullable(true);
> To test the code you have to go to EyeOpen.Data.IntegrationTest
> project,
> remove the comment ////INhibernateMapping mapping = new
> FooModelMapping();
> to use the FooModelMapping class and run the tests.
> Thx!
> On May 26, 12:34 am, Matteo Migliore <matteo.migli...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > The problem could be in the first line of method Property of the class
> > PropertyContainerCustomizer<TEntity>:
> > MemberInfo localMember =
> > TypeExtensions.DecodeMemberAccessExpression<TEntity,
> > TProperty>(property);
> > But I checked, TypeExtensions works well.
> > Uhm...
> > On May 26, 12:26 am, Matteo Migliore <matteo.migli...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > On May 26, 12:21 am, Fabio Maulo <fabioma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > The exception is clear.
> > > Yes, it is :).
> > > But I don't understand how to solve it.
> > > > What is not clear is UniqueEntityMapping<T>
> > > > btw you are wrongly creating an instance of PropertyPath passing a null as
> > > > localMember
> > > I can publish the latest version of source code.
> > > Btw the base class of UniqueEntityMapping<T> is:
> > > public abstract class EntityMapping<TEntity> :
> > > IEntityMapping<TEntity>
> > > where TEntity : IUniqueEntity
> > > {
> > > private readonly IDictionary<object, Action<IPropertyMapper>>
> > > properties =
> > > new Dictionary<object, Action<IPropertyMapper>>();
> > > > > I call this method in the base class of the "mapping class":
> > > > > mapper.Class<TEntity>(c => c.Property(p => property.Key,
> > > > > property.Value));
> > > > > Where localProperty is a:
> > > > > KeyValuePair<object, Action<IPropertyMapper>>.
> > > > > I obtain this exception:
> > > > > {"Value cannot be null.\r\nParameter name: localMember"}
> Now is possible to write this using ConfOrm: > var connection = > new NhibernateMicrosoftSqlServerConnection > { > DataSource = Connection.DataSource, > Catalog = string.Concat(Connection.Catalog), > IsTrustedConnection = Connection.IsTrustedConnection > };
> INhibernateMapping mapping = new FooModelMapping(); > ////INhibernateMapping mapping = new FooFlatModelMapping();
> configuration = > new NhibernateConfigurationBuilder()
> And the mapping: > public class CustomerMapper : UniqueEntityMapping<Customer> > { > public CustomerMapper() > { > Property(p => p.FirstName) > .Lenght(200) > .NotNullable(true);
> Great! > On May 26, 1:04 pm, Matteo Migliore <matteo.migli...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I published the latest version here:http://goo.gl/DlErQ.
> > To test the code you have to go to EyeOpen.Data.IntegrationTest > > project, > > remove the comment ////INhibernateMapping mapping = new > > FooModelMapping(); > > to use the FooModelMapping class and run the tests.
> > Thx!
> > On May 26, 12:34 am, Matteo Migliore <matteo.migli...@gmail.com> > > wrote:
> > > The problem could be in the first line of method Property of the class > > > PropertyContainerCustomizer<TEntity>: > > > MemberInfo localMember = > > > TypeExtensions.DecodeMemberAccessExpression<TEntity, > > > TProperty>(property);
> > > But I checked, TypeExtensions works well.
> > > Uhm...
> > > On May 26, 12:26 am, Matteo Migliore <matteo.migli...@gmail.com> > > > wrote:
> > > > On May 26, 12:21 am, Fabio Maulo <fabioma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > The exception is clear.
> > > > Yes, it is :).
> > > > But I don't understand how to solve it.
> > > > > What is not clear is UniqueEntityMapping<T> > > > > > btw you are wrongly creating an instance of PropertyPath passing a > null as > > > > > localMember
> > > > I can publish the latest version of source code.
> > > > Btw the base class of UniqueEntityMapping<T> is: > > > > public abstract class EntityMapping<TEntity> : > > > > IEntityMapping<TEntity> > > > > where TEntity : IUniqueEntity > > > > { > > > > private readonly IDictionary<object, Action<IPropertyMapper>> > > > > properties = > > > > new Dictionary<object, Action<IPropertyMapper>>();
> > > > > > I call this method in the base class of the "mapping class": > > > > > > mapper.Class<TEntity>(c => c.Property(p => property.Key, > > > > > > property.Value));
> > > > > > Where localProperty is a: > > > > > > KeyValuePair<object, Action<IPropertyMapper>>.
> > > > > > I obtain this exception: > > > > > > {"Value cannot be null.\r\nParameter name: localMember"}
> > Now is possible to write this using ConfOrm:
> > var connection =
> > new NhibernateMicrosoftSqlServerConnection
> > {
> > DataSource = Connection.DataSource,
> > Catalog = string.Concat(Connection.Catalog),
> > IsTrustedConnection = Connection.IsTrustedConnection
> > };
> > INhibernateMapping mapping = new FooModelMapping();
> > ////INhibernateMapping mapping = new FooFlatModelMapping();
> > configuration =
> > new NhibernateConfigurationBuilder()
> > Great!
> > On May 26, 1:04 pm, Matteo Migliore <matteo.migli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I published the latest version here:http://goo.gl/DlErQ.
> > > To test the code you have to go to EyeOpen.Data.IntegrationTest
> > > project,
> > > remove the comment ////INhibernateMapping mapping = new
> > > FooModelMapping();
> > > to use the FooModelMapping class and run the tests.
> > > Thx!
> > > On May 26, 12:34 am, Matteo Migliore <matteo.migli...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > The problem could be in the first line of method Property of the class
> > > > PropertyContainerCustomizer<TEntity>:
> > > > MemberInfo localMember =
> > > > TypeExtensions.DecodeMemberAccessExpression<TEntity,
> > > > TProperty>(property);
> > > > But I checked, TypeExtensions works well.
> > > > Uhm...
> > > > On May 26, 12:26 am, Matteo Migliore <matteo.migli...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > On May 26, 12:21 am, Fabio Maulo <fabioma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > The exception is clear.
> > > > > Yes, it is :).
> > > > > But I don't understand how to solve it.
> > > > > > What is not clear is UniqueEntityMapping<T>
> > > > > > btw you are wrongly creating an instance of PropertyPath passing a
> > null as
> > > > > > localMember
> > > > > I can publish the latest version of source code.
> > > > > Btw the base class of UniqueEntityMapping<T> is:
> > > > > public abstract class EntityMapping<TEntity> :
> > > > > IEntityMapping<TEntity>
> > > > > where TEntity : IUniqueEntity
> > > > > {
> > > > > private readonly IDictionary<object, Action<IPropertyMapper>>
> > > > > properties =
> > > > > new Dictionary<object, Action<IPropertyMapper>>();
> > > > > > > I call this method in the base class of the "mapping class":
> > > > > > > mapper.Class<TEntity>(c => c.Property(p => property.Key,
> > > > > > > property.Value));
> > > > > > > Where localProperty is a:
> > > > > > > KeyValuePair<object, Action<IPropertyMapper>>.
> > > > > > > I obtain this exception:
> > > > > > > {"Value cannot be null.\r\nParameter name: localMember"}
> > > Great! > > > On May 26, 1:04 pm, Matteo Migliore <matteo.migli...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I published the latest version here:http://goo.gl/DlErQ.
> > > > To test the code you have to go to EyeOpen.Data.IntegrationTest > > > > project, > > > > remove the comment ////INhibernateMapping mapping = new > > > > FooModelMapping(); > > > > to use the FooModelMapping class and run the tests.
> > > > Thx!
> > > > On May 26, 12:34 am, Matteo Migliore <matteo.migli...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > The problem could be in the first line of method Property of the > class > > > > > PropertyContainerCustomizer<TEntity>: > > > > > MemberInfo localMember = > > > > > TypeExtensions.DecodeMemberAccessExpression<TEntity, > > > > > TProperty>(property);
> > > > > But I checked, TypeExtensions works well.
> > > > > Uhm...
> > > > > On May 26, 12:26 am, Matteo Migliore <matteo.migli...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > On May 26, 12:21 am, Fabio Maulo <fabioma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > The exception is clear.
> > > > > > Yes, it is :).
> > > > > > But I don't understand how to solve it.
> > > > > > > What is not clear is UniqueEntityMapping<T> > > > > > > > btw you are wrongly creating an instance of PropertyPath > passing a > > > null as > > > > > > > localMember
> > > > > > I can publish the latest version of source code.
> > > > > > Btw the base class of UniqueEntityMapping<T> is: > > > > > > public abstract class EntityMapping<TEntity> : > > > > > > IEntityMapping<TEntity> > > > > > > where TEntity : IUniqueEntity > > > > > > { > > > > > > private readonly IDictionary<object, > Action<IPropertyMapper>> > > > > > > properties = > > > > > > new Dictionary<object, > Action<IPropertyMapper>>();
> > > > Great!
> > > > On May 26, 1:04 pm, Matteo Migliore <matteo.migli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > I published the latest version here:http://goo.gl/DlErQ.
> > > > > To test the code you have to go to EyeOpen.Data.IntegrationTest
> > > > > project,
> > > > > remove the comment ////INhibernateMapping mapping = new
> > > > > FooModelMapping();
> > > > > to use the FooModelMapping class and run the tests.
> > > > > Thx!
> > > > > On May 26, 12:34 am, Matteo Migliore <matteo.migli...@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > The problem could be in the first line of method Property of the
> > class
> > > > > > PropertyContainerCustomizer<TEntity>:
> > > > > > MemberInfo localMember =
> > > > > > TypeExtensions.DecodeMemberAccessExpression<TEntity,
> > > > > > TProperty>(property);
> > > > > > But I checked, TypeExtensions works well.
> > > > > > > On May 26, 12:21 am, Fabio Maulo <fabioma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > The exception is clear.
> > > > > > > Yes, it is :).
> > > > > > > But I don't understand how to solve it.
> > > > > > > > What is not clear is UniqueEntityMapping<T>
> > > > > > > > btw you are wrongly creating an instance of PropertyPath
> > passing a
> > > > null as
> > > > > > > > localMember
> > > > > > > I can publish the latest version of source code.
> > > > > > > Btw the base class of UniqueEntityMapping<T> is:
> > > > > > > public abstract class EntityMapping<TEntity> :
> > > > > > > IEntityMapping<TEntity>
> > > > > > > where TEntity : IUniqueEntity
> > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > private readonly IDictionary<object,
> > Action<IPropertyMapper>>
> > > > > > > properties =
> > > > > > > new Dictionary<object,
> > Action<IPropertyMapper>>();
> > > > > Great! > > > > > On May 26, 1:04 pm, Matteo Migliore <matteo.migli...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > I published the latest version here:http://goo.gl/DlErQ.
> > > > > > To test the code you have to go to EyeOpen.Data.IntegrationTest > > > > > > project, > > > > > > remove the comment ////INhibernateMapping mapping = new > > > > > > FooModelMapping(); > > > > > > to use the FooModelMapping class and run the tests.
> > > > > > > The problem could be in the first line of method Property of > the > > > class > > > > > > > PropertyContainerCustomizer<TEntity>: > > > > > > > MemberInfo localMember = > > > > > > > TypeExtensions.DecodeMemberAccessExpression<TEntity, > > > > > > > TProperty>(property);
> > > > > > > But I checked, TypeExtensions works well.
Oh wonderful! So cannot separate it from NH "ASAP"? I can use ConfOrm
with EF "now"
because for some project I don't need all feats of NH and of course I
would publish source
code of our progress (the team of HSDK where there's Alessandro
Giorgetti also).
On May 26, 10:25 pm, Fabio Maulo <fabioma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Since the beginning... that is the reason of the generic name not referring
> NH.
> btw, EF4 has too few features to be used in a pure OO domain-model.
> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Matteo Migliore
> <matteo.migli...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > I don't understand.
> > I'm creating a mapping system that could be used with EF and NH.
> > Do you plan to make ConfOrm separated to NH for a part to allow to use
> > it with EF also?
> > On May 26, 8:52 pm, Fabio Maulo <fabioma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > That is what ConfORM mean.
> > > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Matteo Migliore
> > > <matteo.migli...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > > > Oh god :(. U're right. I also read your post time ago... Grrr :).
> > > > Anyway, the scope of the mapping is have an abstract mapping system to
> > > > use with EF and NH.
> > > > > > Great!
> > > > > > On May 26, 1:04 pm, Matteo Migliore <matteo.migli...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > I published the latest version here:http://goo.gl/DlErQ.
> > > > > > > To test the code you have to go to EyeOpen.Data.IntegrationTest
> > > > > > > project,
> > > > > > > remove the comment ////INhibernateMapping mapping = new
> > > > > > > FooModelMapping();
> > > > > > > to use the FooModelMapping class and run the tests.
In the current state of the art, i don't recommend you to build nothing on top of EF. OTOH; I don't see why something like that will be useful. Each ORM has their own features for mapping... or at least EF has much less than NH, why you would abstract the mapping thing? With the current ORMs in .Net you can't map a four-class domain as-is in two different ORMs. This menas that if you want to change the orm you have to do major changes in your entities...
> Oh wonderful! So cannot separate it from NH "ASAP"? I can use ConfOrm > with EF "now" > because for some project I don't need all feats of NH and of course I > would publish source > code of our progress (the team of HSDK where there's Alessandro > Giorgetti also).
> On May 26, 10:25 pm, Fabio Maulo <fabioma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Since the beginning... that is the reason of the generic name not > referring > > NH. > > btw, EF4 has too few features to be used in a pure OO domain-model.
> > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Matteo Migliore > > <matteo.migli...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > > I don't understand.
> > > I'm creating a mapping system that could be used with EF and NH.
> > > Do you plan to make ConfOrm separated to NH for a part to allow to use > > > it with EF also?
> > > On May 26, 8:52 pm, Fabio Maulo <fabioma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > That is what ConfORM mean.
> > > > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Matteo Migliore > > > > <matteo.migli...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > > > > Oh god :(. U're right. I also read your post time ago... Grrr :).
> > > > > Anyway, the scope of the mapping is have an abstract mapping system > to > > > > > use with EF and NH.
> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > I published the latest version here:http://goo.gl/DlErQ.
> > > > > > > > To test the code you have to go to > EyeOpen.Data.IntegrationTest > > > > > > > > project, > > > > > > > > remove the comment ////INhibernateMapping mapping = new > > > > > > > > FooModelMapping(); > > > > > > > > to use the FooModelMapping class and run the tests.
> In the current state of the art, i don't recommend you to build nothing on
> top of EF.
> OTOH; I don't see why something like that will be useful. Each ORM has their
> own features for mapping... or at least EF has much less than NH, why you
> would abstract the mapping thing?
> With the current ORMs in .Net you can't map a four-class domain as-is in two
> different ORMs.
> This menas that if you want to change the orm you have to do major changes
> in your entities...
Come dicevo, in scenari molto semplici anche EF IMHO può essere
adottato.
Certo, non è ancora neanche paragonabile a NH, ma ci sono alcune
similutidini che non mi sarei
aspettato prima di iniziarlo a studiare più approfonditamente :).
On May 26, 10:47 pm, Fabio Maulo <fabioma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Salutalo e digli che un solo sistema di query, che non da alcuna chance di
> essere ottimizzato, non é first class citizen
> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Matteo Migliore
> <matteo.migli...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > Oh wonderful! So cannot separate it from NH "ASAP"? I can use ConfOrm
> > with EF "now"
> > because for some project I don't need all feats of NH and of course I
> > would publish source
> > code of our progress (the team of HSDK where there's Alessandro
> > Giorgetti also).
> > On May 26, 10:25 pm, Fabio Maulo <fabioma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Since the beginning... that is the reason of the generic name not
> > referring
> > > NH.
> > > btw, EF4 has too few features to be used in a pure OO domain-model.
> > > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Matteo Migliore
> > > <matteo.migli...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > > > I don't understand.
> > > > I'm creating a mapping system that could be used with EF and NH.
> > > > Do you plan to make ConfOrm separated to NH for a part to allow to use
> > > > it with EF also?
> > > > On May 26, 8:52 pm, Fabio Maulo <fabioma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > That is what ConfORM mean.
> > > > > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Matteo Migliore
> > > > > <matteo.migli...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > > > > > Oh god :(. U're right. I also read your post time ago... Grrr :).
> > > > > > Anyway, the scope of the mapping is have an abstract mapping system
> > to
> > > > > > use with EF and NH.
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > I published the latest version here:http://goo.gl/DlErQ.
> > > > > > > > > To test the code you have to go to
> > EyeOpen.Data.IntegrationTest
> > > > > > > > > project,
> > > > > > > > > remove the comment ////INhibernateMapping mapping = new
> > > > > > > > > FooModelMapping();
> > > > > > > > > to use the FooModelMapping class and run the tests.
